Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390052›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2020

FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation in invasive cervical cancer: A retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study.

Frederique J Vink, Chris J L M Meijer, Gary M Clifford, Mario Poljak, Anja Oštrbenk, Karl Ulrich Petry, Beate Rothe, Jesper Bonde, Helle Pedersen, Silvia de Sanjosé and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Frederique J VinkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-9167
Chris J L M MeijerCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gary M CliffordInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7534-333X
Mario PoljakInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anja OštrbenkInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Karl Ulrich PetryDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Beate RotheInstitute for Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Jesper BondeMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4853-6747
Helle PedersenMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Silvia de SanjoséPATH, Seattle, WA.
Montserrat TorresInfections and Cancer Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Del PinoFaculty of Medicine, Institut Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-2403
Wim G V QuintDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Kate CuschieriScottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-3928
Elia Alcañiz BoadaHPV Research Group, Division of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nienke E van TrommelDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Birgit I Lissenberg-WitteAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arno N FlooreSelf-screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Albertus T HesselinkSelf-screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renske D M SteenbergenCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-9839
Maaike C G BleekerCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniëlle A M HeidemanCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-7391
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHvidovre Hospital · DKUniversity of Ljubljana · SIZF Screens (Netherlands) · NLCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESDDL Diagnostic Laboratory · NLEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBFraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg · DEInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ESInstitute for Transfusion Medicine · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread adoption of primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening has encouraged the search for a triage test which retains high sensitivity for the detection of cervical cancer and precancer, but increases specificity to avoid overtreatment. Methylation analysis of FAM19A4 and miR124-2 genes has shown promise for the triage of high-risk (hr) HPV-positive women. In our study, we assessed the consistency of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis in the detection of cervical cancer in a series of 519 invasive cervical carcinomas (n = 314 cervical scrapes, n = 205 tissue specimens) from over 25 countries, using a quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP)-based assay (QIAsure Methylation Test®). Positivity rates stratified per histotype, FIGO stage, hrHPV status, hrHPV genotype, sample type and geographical region were calculated. In total, 510 of the 519 cervical carcinomas (98.3%; 95% CI: 96.7-99.2) tested FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation-positive. Test positivity was consistent across the different subgroups based on cervical cancer histotype, FIGO stage, hrHPV status, hrHPV genotype, sample type and geographical region. In conclusion, FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis detects nearly all cervical carcinomas, including rare histotypes and hrHPV-negative carcinomas. These results indicate that a negative FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation assay result is likely to rule out the presence of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationCross-Sectional StudiesCytokinesFemaleGenotypeHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMass ScreeningMicroRNAsPapillomavirus InfectionsRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsCytokinesMicroRNAsMIRN124 microRNA, humanTAFA4 protein, humanbiomarkercervical carcinomacervical screeningDNA hypermethylationhuman genome methylationhuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID31390052
PMCPMC7383900
OpenAlexW2966196515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.