ArticleJAMA psychiatry2019
Association Between P300 Responses to Auditory Oddball Stimuli and Clinical Outcomes in the Psychosis Risk Syndrome.
Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating event-related potential (ERP) deviations in clinical high-risk populations for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Auditory event-related potentials and psychosis dimensions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Visual P300 and Risk for Psychosis Onset in Youth at Clinical High Risk.Biological psychiatry · 2026Article
- Phantom vibrations: An understudied marker of clinical risk for psychosis.Schizophrenia research · 2026Article
- Decoding P300 as a shared neural mechanism for oddball target detection and working memory updating.iScience · 2026Article
- Associations between attenuated auditory p300 event-related potential and cognitive basic symptoms in young people at clinical high risk for psychosis.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- Excitation/inhibition imbalance and conversion to psychosis in the clinical high risk syndrome: Biophysical modeling finds reduced pyramidal cell excitability across EEG paradigms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of early adolescent lead exposure on brain function and response: Findings from a Chinese cohort.Neurotoxicology · 2025Article
- Alterations of NoGo P300 ERP in schizophrenia in social setting: a hyperscanning study.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Neighborhood social fragmentation in relation to impaired mismatch negativity among youth at clinical high risk for psychosis and healthy comparisons.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Article
- The electroencephalography protocol for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program: Reliability and stability of measures.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Neurocognitive resilience as a predictor of psychosis onset and functional outcomes in individuals at high risk.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Channel component correlation analysis for multi-channel EEG feature component extraction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Localizing hierarchical prediction errors and precisions during an oddball task with volatility: Computational insights and relationship with psychosocial functioning in healthy individuals.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Addressing the elephant in the screening room: an item response theory analysis of the Prodromal Questionnaire for at-risk symptoms of psychosis.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025Article
- Psychosis superspectrum II: neurobiology, treatment, and implications.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
- Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia (AMP® SCZ): Rationale and Study Design of the Largest Global Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- P300 in schizophrenia: Then and now.Biological psychology · 2024Review
- Kenya Psychosis-Risk Outcomes Study (KePROS): Development of an Accelerated Medicine Partnership Schizophrenia-Aligned Project in Africa.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2024Article
- Biomarkers for Psychosis: Are We There Yet? Umbrella Review of 1478 Biomarkers.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In most patients, a prodromal period precedes the onset of schizophrenia. Although clinical criteria for identifying the psychosis risk syndrome (PRS) show promising predictive validity, assessment of neurophysiologic abnormalities in at-risk individuals may improve clinical prediction and clarify the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Objective: To determine whether P300 event-related potential amplitude, which is deficient in schizophrenia, is reduced in the PRS and associated with clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Auditory P300 data were collected as part of the multisite, case-control North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS-2) at 8 university-based outpatient programs. Participants included 552 individuals meeting PRS criteria and 236 healthy controls with P300 data. Auditory P300 data of participants at risk who converted to psychosis (n = 73) were compared with those of nonconverters who were followed up for 24 months and continued to be symptomatic (n = 135) or remitted from the PRS (n = 90). Data were collected from May 27, 2009, to September 17, 2014, and were analyzed from December 3, 2015, to May 1, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline electroencephalography was recorded during an auditory oddball task. Two P300 subcomponents were measured: P3b, elicited by infrequent target stimuli, and P3a, elicited by infrequent nontarget novel stimuli. Results: This study included 788 participants. The PRS group (n = 552) included 236 females (42.8%) (mean [SD] age, 19.21 [4.38] years), and the healthy control group (n = 236) included 111 females (47.0%) (mean [SD] age, 20.44 [4.73] years). Target P3b and novelty P3a amplitudes were reduced in at-risk individuals vs healthy controls (d = 0.37). Target P3b, but not novelty P3a, was significantly reduced in psychosis converters vs nonconverters (d = 0.26), and smaller target P3b amplitude was associated with a shorter time to psychosis onset in at-risk individuals (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.00; P = .03). Participants with the PRS who remitted had baseline target P3b amplitudes that were similar to those of healthy controls and greater than those of converters (d = 0.51) and at-risk individuals who remained symptomatic (d = 0.41). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, deficits in P300 amplitude appeared to precede psychosis onset. Target P3b amplitudes, in particular, may be sensitive to clinical outcomes in the PRS, including both conversion to psychosis and clinical remission. Auditory target P3b amplitude shows promise as a putative prognostic biomarker of clinical outcome in the PRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.