ArticleCritical care medicine2019
A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
139 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Modeling for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2025Pooled it
- Revolutionizing sepsis diagnosis using machine learning and deep learning models: a systematic literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for surgical outcome prediction in glaucoma: a systematic review.Frontiers in big data · 2025Pooled it
- Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Predicting sepsis onset in ICU using machine learning models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Deployment of machine learning algorithms to predict sepsis: systematic review and application of the SALIENT clinical AI implementation framework.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- Diversity in Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Text-Based Diagnostic Applications.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.Intensive care medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Predictive machine learning algorithm for COPD exacerbations using a digital inhaler with integrated sensors.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Trial
- A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review Study.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Sepsis Algorithmic Alerts Among Hospitalized Pediatric Patients in Qatar: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms for bloodstream infection prediction: a multi-center validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The Sepsis ImmunoScore Predicts Sepsis, Mortality, and Deterioration Better than Clinical Scores and Widely Available Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in intensive care units: a scoping review addressing the translational gap to clinical practice.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Explainable Boosting Machine in Sepsis Prediction Using Platelet Metabolomics: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating the Hospital Frailty Risk Score into Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Mortality in Older Adults with Pneumonia: A Chilean Population-Based Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Privacy-Aware Synthetic Tabular Data Generation for Healthcare: Application to Sepsis Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A rapidly personalized in-hospital bloodstream infection prediction model: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Challenges in early detection and prognostication of sepsis: new approaches from the emergency department and intensive care unit.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDevelop and implement a machine learning algorithm to predict severe sepsis and septic shock and evaluate the impact on clinical practice and patient outcomes.
designRetrospective cohort for algorithm derivation and validation, pre-post impact evaluation.
settingTertiary teaching hospital system in Philadelphia, PA. PATIENTS: All non-ICU admissions; algorithm derivation July 2011 to June 2014 (n = 162,212); algorithm validation October to December 2015 (n = 10,448); silent versus alert comparison January 2016 to February 2017 (silent n = 22,280; alert n = 32,184).
interventionsA random-forest classifier, derived and validated using electronic health record data, was deployed both silently and later with an alert to notify clinical teams of sepsis prediction. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN
resultPatients identified for training the algorithm were required to have International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition codes for severe sepsis or septic shock and a positive blood culture during their hospital encounter with either a lactate greater than 2.2 mmol/L or a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. The algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 26% and specificity of 98%, with a positive predictive value of 29% and positive likelihood ratio of 13. The alert resulted in a small statistically significant increase in lactate testing and IV fluid administration. There was no significant difference in mortality, discharge disposition, or transfer to ICU, although there was a reduction in time-to-ICU transfer.
conclusionsOur machine learning algorithm can predict, with low sensitivity but high specificity, the impending occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock. Algorithm-generated predictive alerts modestly impacted clinical measures. Next steps include describing clinical perception of this tool and optimizing algorithm design and delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.