Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31389838›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2019

End-of-Life Decision-Making for ICU Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Team Insights.

Amelia K Barwise, Christina A Nyquist, Nataly R Espinoza Suarez, Carolina Jaramillo, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, Ognjen Gajic, Michael E Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Hidden Disparities: How Language Influences Patients' Access to Cancer Care.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amelia K BarwiseDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Christina A NyquistBiomedical Research Program, Bioethics Research Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Nataly R Espinoza SuarezKnowledge and Encounter Unit (KER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Carolina JaramilloBiomedical Research Program, Bioethics Research Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Bjorg ThorsteinsdottirBiomedical Research Program, Bioethics Research Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ognjen GajicDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Michael E WilsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002380 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity T. B. Enders, ANTHONY John WINDEBANK · 2017 to 2026
$6.0M
Evidence Based Encounter Decision Aid for Elderly Patients to Promote Shared Decision Making on Treatment Choice in End Stage Renal DiseaseK23AG051679 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI THORSTEINSDOTTIR, BJOERG · 2016 to 2020
$908k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002380NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NIA NIH HHS K23 AG051679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResearch indicates that the increasing population of over 25 million people in the United States who have limited English proficiency experience differences in decision-making and subsequent care at end of life in the ICU when compared with the general population. The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions of healthcare team members about the factors that influence discussions and decision-making about end of life for patients and family members with limited English proficiency in the ICU.

designQualitative study using semistructured interviews with ICU physicians, nurses, and interpreters.

settingThree ICUs at Mayo Clinic Rochester. SUBJECTS: Sixteen ICU physicians, 12 ICU nurses, and 12 interpreters.

interventionNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWe conducted 40 semistructured interviews. We identified six key differences in end-of-life decision-making for patients with limited English proficiency compared with patients without limited English proficiency: 1) clinician communication is modified and less frequent; 2) clinician ability to assess patient and family understanding is impaired; 3) relationship building is impaired; 4) patient and family understanding of decision-making concepts (e.g., palliative care) is impaired; 5) treatment limitations are often perceived to be unacceptable due to faith-based and cultural beliefs; and 6) patient and family decision-making styles are different. Facilitators of high-quality decision-making in patients with limited English proficiency included: 1) premeeting between clinician and interpreter; 2) interpretation that communicates empathy and caring; 3) bidirectional communication of cultural perspectives; 4) interpretation that improves messaging including appropriate word choice; and 5) clinician cultural humility.

conclusionsEnd-of-life decision-making is significantly different for ICU patients with limited English proficiency. Participants identified several barriers and facilitators to high-quality end-of-life decision-making for ICU patients and families with limited English proficiency. Awareness of these factors can facilitate interventions to improve high-quality, compassionate, and culturally sensitive decision-making for patients and families with limited English proficiency.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunication BarriersDecision MakingFamilyIntensive Care UnitsLimited English ProficiencyPatient Care TeamTerminal CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID31389838
PMCPMC7643693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.