Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31389405›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Treatment of Complex Renal Calculi by Digital Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Combined with Single-Tract Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone Position: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Huayu Gao, Hui Zhang, Yunchao Wang, Kai Li, Wenzhi Du, Xiangyu Wang, Jianning Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Current role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones: A scoping review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  10. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery: best practices and future perspectives.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huayu GaoShandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Hui ZhangShandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Yunchao WangShandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Kai LiShandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Wenzhi DuShandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Xiangyu WangShandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Jianning WangShandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Shandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have resulted in smaller devices that cause less trauma and bleeding, while flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) allows access to any calyces. These methods are often used in isolation, but used in combination they may improve treatment of complex renal calculi. This study assessed the effectiveness and complications of f-URS combined with super-mini-PCNL (SMP) to treat complex renal calculi. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was made of patients with unilateral complex renal stones treated between March 2013 and December 2016. Patients were grouped according to surgical procedure: SMP (SMP Group), f-URS holmium laser lithotripsy (f-URS Group), and combined SMP and f-URS (Combined Group). The postoperative complications and complete stone-free rate were analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS A total of 140 patients with complex renal stones were included: 40 patients in the SMP Group, 55 in the f-URS Group, and 45 in the Combined Group. The complete stone-free rate 3 days after the procedure was 77.5% in the SMP Group, 78.2% in the f-URS Group, and 97.8% in the Combined Group (p=0.010). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time of the Combined Group were all significantly lower than those in the SMP Group but higher than those in the f-URS Group. The follow-up was 9 months (range, 6-12 months). There were no medium-term complications reported. CONCLUSIONS SMP combined with f-URS holmium laser lithotripsy in the prone position is an effective treatment for complex renal calculi.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKidneyKidney CalculiLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsProne PositionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31389405
PMCPMC6693367
OpenAlexW2966276587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.