Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31389334›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2019

Use of Short Messaging Service to Improve Follow-Up for Abnormal Pap Test Results in Minority and Medically Underserved Women in North Carolina: Questionnaire on Attitudes and Acceptability.

LaHoma Smith Romocki, Andrea Des Marais, Leslie Cofie, Chelsea Anderson, Theresa Curington, Jennifer Susan Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Text Message Preferences for Surveillance Colonoscopy Reminders Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

LaHoma Smith RomockiDepartment of Public Health Education, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0713-7467
Andrea Des MaraisDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-0109
Leslie CofieDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5944
Chelsea Anderson *Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6535-481X
Theresa CuringtonSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-5647
Jennifer Susan SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-0422
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USEast Carolina University · USNorth Carolina Central University · US

Funding

Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156735 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARDSON, MICHELER RICARDO · 2010 to 2021
$13.0M
Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156733 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LINNAN, LAURA A · 2010 to 2020
$9.7M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156733NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn estimated one in eight cervical cancer cases are due to a lack of follow-up care for abnormal Pap test results. Low rates of completion of follow-up care particularly affect low-income minority women. The burden of cervical cancer could be reduced through interventions that improve timely colposcopy follow-up and treatment of abnormal screening results. Mobile communications via text messaging present a low-cost opportunity to increase rates of clinic return among women referred to follow-up after obtaining abnormal screening results.

objectiveOur aims were to determine the acceptability and feasibility of using text messaging to increase completion of follow-up care following abnormal cervical cancer screening (Pap test) results and to examine factors that may affect the acceptability and use of text messaging to increase communications between health care providers (HCP) and low-income minority women.

methodsThe study participants were 15 low-income women who had undergone a Pap test within the preceding 12 months. Semistructured interviews, including open- and closed-ended questions from a validated questionnaire, were conducted by phone or in person. Responses to closed-ended survey items were tabulated, and descriptive statistics were generated using Microsoft Excel. Responses to the open-ended questions were coded and analyzed using NVivo 11 qualitative analysis software.

resultsNearly all participants (14/15, 93%) were comfortable receiving a text message from an HCP stating that their Pap test results were available (<40 years: 100%; ≥40 years: 86%). Over half (8/15; 53%) of the participants were comfortable receiving a text message stating that their Pap test results were abnormal, although many preferred to receive such information via a phone call (6/15; 40%). Most participants (9/15; 60%) believed that receiving a text reminder would make them more likely to attend their appointment. The preferred method for receiving a reminder appeared to vary by age, with older women preferring telephone reminders over text messaging reminders. Analysis of open-ended questions suggested that text messaging appeals to some women due to its wide use and convenience for communicating with HCPs. However, women cited concerns about the confidentiality of messages and barriers to understanding the messages, including the physical capacity to read and accurately interpret the content of the messaging.

conclusionsMost participants indicated a willingness to receive text messages from their HCPs about cervical cancer screening results and believed that text messages were the best way to remind them of appointments for follow-up care. Potential concerns could be addressed by excluding explicit references to the nature of the appointment in the text message in order to avoid disclosure of sensitive health information to unauthorized individuals. Although text messaging seems promising to improve adherence to timely follow-up, personal preferences should be considered by allowing patients to opt-out of text communications.

Indexed as

abnormal resultsappointment reminderscervical cancerPap teststext messaging

Identifiers

PMID31389334
PMCPMC6701163
OpenAlexW2964783626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.