Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31389287›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care

Comparative Analysis of two Methods of Measuring Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence in HIV-Infected Omani Patients.

Zied Gaifer, Mohamed-Rachid Boulassel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zied Gaifer1 Department of Medicine, National Guard Hospital, Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed-Rachid Boulassel3 Department of Hematology, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Sib, Sultanate of Oman.ORCID 0000-0001-5717-7884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence is crucial to achieve HIV suppression and to prolong survival of HIV-infected patients. Although monitoring of ART adherence is standard of HIV care, there is yet no optimal method to measure ART adherence. Therefore, it is essential to compare the effectiveness of different adherence measurement tools to predict HIV suppression.

methodsIn this study, we measured ART adherence using pharmacy refill prescription and self-reported adherence questionnaire. Both the methods were compared for predicting HIV suppression in adult Omani HIV-infected patients attending the outpatient clinics at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.

resultsA total of 141 HIV-infected patients were included. The pharmacy refill-based measure showed a median adherence rate of 98.90% (interquartile range [IQR]: 86%-99.45%). The self-report adherence questionnaire revealed a median adherence rate of 100% (IQR: 75-100). A significant positive correlation was found between the adherence rates measured by the 2 methods (

conclusionCollectively, these findings suggest that pharmacy refill measure could serve as a valid and practical tool of ART adherence in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedOmanPrescriptionsRNA, ViralSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Retroviral AgentsRNA, ViraladherenceARTHIVpatientspharmacy refillquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID31389287
PMCPMC6900587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.