Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31389089›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2019

Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC)-Validation of a new dementia case-finding instrument integrating cognitive assessment with patient and informant report.

Kasper Jørgensen, T Rune Nielsen, Ann Nielsen, Frans Boch Waldorff, Peter Høgh, Søren Jakobsen, Hanne Gottrup, Karsten Vestergaard, Gunhild Waldemar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conversion between the Brief assessment of Impaired Cognition, Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire, and Mini-Mental State Examination in a mixed clinical sample.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Validation of the brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) and brief assessment of impaired cognition questionnaire (BASIC-Q) in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kasper JørgensenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1395-5143
T Rune NielsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann NielsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frans Boch WaldorffSection of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter HøghRegional Dementia Research Centre, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Søren JakobsenDepartment of Geriatrics, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.
Hanne GottrupDementia Clinic, Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karsten VestergaardDementia Clinic, Department of Neurology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Gunhild WaldemarDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a new brief and accurate case-finding instrument for dementia and cognitive impairment. Previous research indicates that combining cognitive tests with informant and/or patient report may improve accuracy in dementia case-finding. The Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC) integrates these three sources of information.

methodsBASIC was prospectively validated in five memory clinics. Patients consecutively referred from general practice were tested at their initial visit prior to diagnosis. Control participants were primarily recruited among participating patients' relatives. Expert clinical diagnosis was subsequently used as gold standard for estimation of the classification accuracy of BASIC.

resultsA very high discriminative validity (specificity 0.98, sensitivity 0.95) for dementia (n = 122) versus socio-demographically matched control participants (n = 109) was found. In comparison, the MMSE had 0.90 specificity and 0.82 sensitivity. Extending the discriminative validity analysis to cognitive impairment (both dementia and MCI, n = 162) only slightly reduced the discriminative validity of BASIC whereas the discriminative validity of the MMSE was substantially attenuated. Administration time for BASIC was approximately 5 minutes compared with 10 to 15 minutes for the MMSE.

conclusionsBASIC was found to be an efficient and valid case-finding instrument for dementia and cognitive impairment in a memory clinic setting.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBASICcognitive assessmentcognitive impairmentcognitive screeningdementiadiagnostic accuracydiscriminative validitypredictive validity

Identifiers

PMID31389089
PMCPMC6852234
OpenAlexW2964634137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.