Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388934›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2019

HER2 double-equivocal breast cancer in Chinese patients: a high concordance of HER2 status between different blocks from the same tumor.

Yuanyuan Liu, Shafei Wu, Xiaohua Shi, Yufeng Luo, Junyi Pang, Changjun Wang, Feng Mao, Zhiyong Liang, Xuan Zeng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Expression of the immune checkpoint VISTA in breast cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuanyuan LiuMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shafei WuMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaohua ShiMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yufeng LuoMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Junyi PangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changjun WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Feng MaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiyong LiangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuan ZengMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. zengxuan88@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-753X
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2016-I2M-1-002Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2017-I2M-1-005National Human and Population Scientific Data Sharing Platform 2015KJRK1L01National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC1309004Pathology Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2016ZX310176-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is both an independent prognostic factor and a predictive factor for the efficacy of targeted therapy for breast cancer, so it is critical to accurately detect HER2 protein expression and/or gene amplification. According to the recommendations of the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines for HER2 breast cancer testing, an additional test should be pursued on a different block from the same tumor as one of the options for patients with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ and a HER2/CEP17 ratio of < 2.0 with an average HER2 signals per tumor cell of ≥ 4.0 and < 6.0 by reflex test using dual-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (double-equivocal HER2). Our aim in this study is to explore the consistency of HER2 status between the two blocks.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 5685 primary invasive breast cancers between April 2015 and January 2019 from Peking Union Medical College Hospital. For cases with double-equivocal HER2 revealed in initial blocks, HER2 gene status was evaluated by FISH in a different block from the same tumor. The FISH score was interpreted according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing.

resultsIn our cohort of 5685 specimens, the overall HER2 IHC3+, 2+, 1+ and 0 cases were 20.5%, 31.8%, 28.3%, and 19.5%, respectively. Then, 13.7%, 66.3%, and 20.0% of HER2 amplification, non-amplification, and equivocation rates were found, respectively, in IHC2+ patients (n = 1777) by reflex FISH assay. For specimens with double-equivocal HER2 (n = 333), HER2 status was assessed in another block from the same tumor by FISH and then the frequency of HER2 positive, negative, and equivocation was estimated at 5.7%, 22.5%, and 71.8%, respectively. Because double-equivocal HER2 cases are classified in the HER2 negative category by the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines, only 1.3% (19/1511) of HER2 positive patients were determined through additional HER2 testing in another block from the HER2 negative population.

conclusionsHER2 status in different blocks from the same tumor in primary invasive breast cancer was highly concordant. Our data supported the recommendation of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer to remove the suggestion for additional HER2 testing using another block contained in the previous version.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleBreast NeoplasmsChinaErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasmsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancerEquivocalFISHHER2IHC

Identifiers

PMID31388934
PMCPMC6797640
OpenAlexW2965581205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.