Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388917›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

The Role of Screening in Depression Diagnosis and Treatment in a Representative Sample of US Primary Care Visits.

Hillary Samples, Elizabeth A Stuart, Brendan Saloner, Colleen L Barry, Ramin Mojtabai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hillary SamplesColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. h.samples@columbia.edu.
Elizabeth A StuartJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brendan SalonerJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Colleen L BarryJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ramin MojtabaiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

TRAINING IN HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCHT32HS000029 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS · 1987 to 2024
$8.3M
Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000029NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA046889NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care providers encounter a large proportion of the population with depression. Yet, many primary care patients with depression remain undiagnosed and untreated.

objectiveThis study aims to examine depression screening patterns and the role of screening in depression diagnosis and treatment in the outpatient primary care setting.

designThis is a cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative survey data of visits to outpatient physician offices from the 2005 to 2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys.

participantsThe sample included the first visit in the past year to a primary care provider by patients 12 years and older (N = 16,887).

methodsThe associations of visit characteristics with depression screening and of depression screening with depression diagnosis and treatment during the visit were assessed using logistic regression. Logistic regression with propensity score weighting was used to estimate the odds of depression diagnosis and treatment under the counterfactual scenario in which patients who visited providers with lower depression screening rates had visited providers with higher screening rates instead. All models were adjusted for patient and visit characteristics. KEY

resultsA small proportion of sample visits involved depression screening (3.0%). Visits by patients with depressive symptom complaints were associated with higher odds of depression screening than other visits. When visits were weighted to have similar demographic and clinical characteristics, visits to providers with higher screening rates had higher odds of diagnosis (OR = 1.99, p < 0.001) and treatment (OR = 1.61, p = 0.001) compared to visits to providers with lower screening rates.

conclusionsPhysicians appear to use depression screening selectively based on patients' presenting symptoms. Higher screening rates were associated with higher odds of depression diagnosis and treatment, and even modest increases in screening rates could meaningfully increase population-level rates of depression identification and treatment in primary care. Future research is needed to identify barriers to depression care and implement systematic interventions to improve services and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

DepressionPrimary Health CareAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care SurveysHumansMass ScreeningOffice VisitsUnited Statesdepressionprimary carescreening

Identifiers

PMID31388917
PMCPMC6957618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.