Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388912›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2019

The Impact of Changes in Medicaid Provider Fees on Provider Participation and Enrollees' Care: a Systematic Literature Review.

Loren Saulsberry, Veri Seo, Vicki Fung

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Association Between the Declining Conversion Factor and Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Loren SaulsberryHealth Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. lsaulsberry@uchicago.edu.
Veri SeoHealth Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Vicki FungHealth Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Medicare Policy Effects on Mental Health Care DisparitiesR01MD010456 · NIMHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI COOK, BENJAMIN LE, FUNG, VICKI · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Medicaid Payment Policy and Access to Care for Dual Eligible BeneficiariesR01HS024725 · AHRQ · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FUNG, VICKI · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024725NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD010456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanging Medicaid fees is a common approach for states to address budget fluctuations, and many currently set Medicaid physician fees at levels lower than Medicare and private insurers. The Affordable Care Act included a temporary Medicaid fee bump for primary care providers (PCPs) in 2013-2014 that recently led to both an increase and then subsequent decrease in PCP fees in many states.

objectiveTo conduct a systematic literature review on the effects of changing Medicaid fees on provider participation and enrollees' access to care and service use.

methodsWe searched PubMed/Medline and JSTOR and identified 18 studies that assessed the longitudinal impact of provider fee changes in Medicaid on the outcomes of interest. We summarized information on study design, methods, and findings.

resultsSeven studies examined the impact of fee changes on provider participation in Medicaid. Of these, three studies found that fee increases were associated with positive effects on providers' likelihood of accepting Medicaid patients or on their Medicaid caseloads. Five studies that examined the impact of fee changes on Medicaid enrollees' access to care found a positive association with one or more access measure, such as having a usual source of care or appointment availability. Lastly, eight of 14 studies that examined service use found positive associations between fee changes and at least one measure of use, such as changes in the probability of enrollees having any visit, the number of visits, and shifts in the site of care toward office-based care; others largely did not find significant associations.

conclusionsThere is mixed evidence on the impact of changing Medicaid fees on provider participation and enrollees' service use; however, increasing fees appears to have more consistent positive effects on access to care. Whether these improvements in access translate into better health outcomes or downstream cost savings are critical questions.

Indexed as

Fees and ChargesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedicaidPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActUnited Statesaccess to carehealth policyMedicaidutilization

Identifiers

PMID31388912
PMCPMC6816688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.