ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Assessing the Bone Age of Children in an Automatic Manner Newborn to 18 Years Range.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research hotspots and trends of pediatric bone age: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Potential of Artificial Intelligence for Bone Age Assessment in Iranian Children and Adolescents: An Exploratory Study.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Article
- Pattern of linear growth and progression of bone maturation for girls with early-onset puberty: A mixed longitudinal study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Texture Analysis of Breast DCE-MRI Based on Intratumoral Subregions for Predicting HER2 2+ Status.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Bone Age Assessment of Iranian Children in an Automatic Manner.Journal of medical signals and sensorsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone age assessment (BAA) is a radiological process to identify the growth disorders in children. Although this is a frequent task for radiologists, it is cumbersome. The objective of this study is to assess the bone age of children from newborn to 18 years old in an automatic manner through computer vision methods including histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), local binary pattern (LBP), and scale invariant feature transform (SIFT). Here, 442 left-hand radiographs are applied from the University of Southern California (USC) hand atlas. In this experiment, for the first time, HOG-LBP-dense SIFT features with background subtraction are applied to assess the bone age of the subject group. For this purpose, features are extracted from the carpal and epiphyseal regions of interest (ROIs). The SVM and 5-fold cross-validation are used for classification. The accuracy of female radiographs is 73.88% and of the male is 68.63%. The mean absolute error is 0.5 years for both genders' radiographs. The accuracy a within 1-year range is 95.32% for female and 96.51% for male radiographs. The accuracy within a 2-year range is 100% and 99.41% for female and male radiographs, respectively. The Cohen's kappa statistical test reveals that this proposed approach, Cohen's kappa coefficients are 0.71 for female and 0.66 for male radiographs, p value < 0.05, is in substantial agreement with the bone age assessed by experienced radiologists within the USC dataset. This approach is robust and easy to implement, thus, qualified for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). The reduced processing time and number of ROIs facilitate BAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.