SynthesisThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Brazilian Society of Cardiology Guideline on Myocarditis - 2022.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Guideline
- Detection of acute myocarditis using T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Pooled it
- The prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in myocarditis and clinically suspected myocarditis: systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Impact of cannabidiol on myocardial recovery in patients with acute myocarditis: primary results of the ARCHER study.ESC heart failure · 2026Trial
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in MINOCA and Acute Myocarditis: A Comparative Multiparametric Evaluation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Observational
- Dilated cardiomyopathy evaluation with Imagenomics: combining multimodal cardiovascular imaging and genetics.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Using machine learning models based on cardiac magnetic resonance parameters to predict the prognostic in children with myocarditis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocarditis with consecutive follow-up and a comparison between non-COVID-19 and COVID-19-associated myocarditis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- The role of cardiac lymphatic dysfunction in the progression of myocarditis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- CMR Predictors of Favorable Outcome in Myocarditis: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Women's Chest Pain: A Question of Gender.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Pediatric Myocarditis.Cardiology and therapy · 2023Review
- Free-running 3D whole-heart TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Positive Predictive Value of ICD-10-CM Codes for Myocarditis in Claims Data: A Multi-Institutional Study in Taiwan.Clinical epidemiology · 2023Article
- Role of Endomyocardial Biopsy in Diagnostics of Myocarditis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Detect Subacute Myocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cardiorenal Syndrome: Emerging Role of Medical Imaging for Clinical Diagnosis and Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While diagnostic criteria were elaborated for acute myocarditis using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in 2009, studies have since examined the yield of traditional and novel CMR parameters to achieve greater accuracy and to predict clinical outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMR parameters for acute myocarditis. MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for original studies that reported CMR parameters in adult patients suspected of acute myocarditis. Each CMR parameter's binary prevalence, mean value and standard deviation were extracted. Parameters were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model to generate standardized mean differences. After screening 1492 abstracts, 53 studies were included encompassing 2823 myocarditis patients and 803 controls. Pooled standardized mean differences between myocarditis patients and controls were: T2 mapping time 2.26 (95% CI 1.50-3.02), extracellular volume 1.64 (95% CI 0.87-2.42), LGE percentage 1.30 (95% CI 0.95-1.64), T1 mapping time 1.18 (95% CI 0.35-2.01), T2 ratio 1.17 (95% CI 0.80-1.54), and EGE ratio 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.19). Prolonged T1 mapping time had the highest sensitivity (82%), pericardial effusion had the highest specificity (99%). Baseline LV dysfunction and the presence of LGE were predictive of major adverse cardiac events. The results support integration of parametric mapping criteria in the diagnostic criteria for myocarditis. The presence of baseline LV dysfunction and LGE predict patients at higher risk of adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31388815What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.