Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388800›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020

Extended evaluation of the efficacy of a proactive forced oscillation technique-based auto-CPAP algorithm.

S D Herkenrath, M Treml, N Anduleit, K Richter, A Pietzke-Calcagnile, M Schwaibold, R Schäfer, R Alshut, A Grimm, L Hagmeyer and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S D HerkenrathBethanien Hospital, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Aufderhoeher Str. 169-175, 42699, Solingen, Germany.
M TremlBethanien Hospital, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Aufderhoeher Str. 169-175, 42699, Solingen, Germany.
N AnduleitBethanien Hospital, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Aufderhoeher Str. 169-175, 42699, Solingen, Germany.
K RichterBethanien Hospital, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Aufderhoeher Str. 169-175, 42699, Solingen, Germany.
A Pietzke-CalcagnileBethanien Hospital, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Aufderhoeher Str. 169-175, 42699, Solingen, Germany.
M SchwaiboldLöwenstein Medical Technology GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
R SchäferLöwenstein Medical Technology GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
R AlshutLöwenstein Medical Technology GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
A GrimmLöwenstein Medical Technology GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
L HagmeyerBethanien Hospital, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Aufderhoeher Str. 169-175, 42699, Solingen, Germany.
W J RanderathBethanien Hospital, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Aufderhoeher Str. 169-175, 42699, Solingen, Germany. randerath@klinik-bethanien.de.
Krankenhaus Bethanien · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies revealed substantially varying therapy efficacy of automatic continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We evaluated the efficacy of a new APAP device using the forced oscillation technique (FOT) to evaluate upper airway obstruction during apneas and flow contour analyses during hypopneas.

methodsForty-six initially diagnosed OSA patients were included and the pressure range was set from 5 to 20 hPa. Therapy efficacy was assessed based on the reduction of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), improvement of objective sleep quality parameters, and the appropriateness of the device's pressure regulation.

resultsAHI and arousal index significantly decreased during APAP therapy (median [interquartile range]: AHI 36 [23-55] vs. 2 [1-6]/h, arousal index 30 [22-45] vs. 15 [10-19]/h, both p < 0.001). The amount of slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep significantly increased (SWS 20 [14-29] vs. 29 [19-34]%, REM 16 [11-21] vs. 24 [14-30]%, both p < 0.01). Most residual respiratory events during therapy were of central etiology and attributable to five patients, who presented with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea. The device's pressure regulation abolished most obstructive respiratory events (n = 6.7 residual obstructive events per patient). Of central respiratory events, 534/646 (83%) did not lead to pressure increases.

conclusionThis pilot study provides a proof of concept that the APAP device combining FOT and evaluation of flow contour allows for the suppression of obstructive events without relevant false reactions.

Indexed as

AdultContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedOscillometryPilot ProjectsPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Function TestsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAutomatic continuous positive airway pressureForced oscillation techniqueOSASleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID31388800
OpenAlexW2964386626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.