ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020
Extended evaluation of the efficacy of a proactive forced oscillation technique-based auto-CPAP algorithm.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Review
- Reliability of respiratory event detection with continuous positive airway pressure in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea - comparison of polysomnography with a device-based analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Article
- The Automatic Algorithm of the Auto-CPAP Device as a Tool for the Assessment of the Treatment Efficacy of CPAP in Patients with Moderate and Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Validating respiratory index of auto-titrating positive airway pressure device with polysomnography.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrevious studies revealed substantially varying therapy efficacy of automatic continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We evaluated the efficacy of a new APAP device using the forced oscillation technique (FOT) to evaluate upper airway obstruction during apneas and flow contour analyses during hypopneas.
methodsForty-six initially diagnosed OSA patients were included and the pressure range was set from 5 to 20 hPa. Therapy efficacy was assessed based on the reduction of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), improvement of objective sleep quality parameters, and the appropriateness of the device's pressure regulation.
resultsAHI and arousal index significantly decreased during APAP therapy (median [interquartile range]: AHI 36 [23-55] vs. 2 [1-6]/h, arousal index 30 [22-45] vs. 15 [10-19]/h, both p < 0.001). The amount of slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep significantly increased (SWS 20 [14-29] vs. 29 [19-34]%, REM 16 [11-21] vs. 24 [14-30]%, both p < 0.01). Most residual respiratory events during therapy were of central etiology and attributable to five patients, who presented with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea. The device's pressure regulation abolished most obstructive respiratory events (n = 6.7 residual obstructive events per patient). Of central respiratory events, 534/646 (83%) did not lead to pressure increases.
conclusionThis pilot study provides a proof of concept that the APAP device combining FOT and evaluation of flow contour allows for the suppression of obstructive events without relevant false reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.