Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388762›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2020

Variation of human salivary alpha-amylase proteoforms in three stimulation models.

María D Contreras-Aguilar, Jerome Vialaret, Dominique Deville de Périère, Damián Escribano, Sylvain Lehmann, Fernando Tecles, Jose J Cerón, Christophe Hirtz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

María D Contreras-AguilarClinic Analysis Interdisciplinary Laboratory (Interlab-UMU), Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain.
Jerome VialaretLBPC/PPC - IRMB, CHU de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier University, 80 rue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier, France.
Dominique Deville de PérièreLBPC/PPC - IRMB, CHU de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier University, 80 rue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier, France.
Damián EscribanoDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sylvain LehmannLBPC/PPC - IRMB, CHU de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier University, 80 rue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier, France.
Fernando TeclesClinic Analysis Interdisciplinary Laboratory (Interlab-UMU), Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain.
Jose J CerónClinic Analysis Interdisciplinary Laboratory (Interlab-UMU), Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain. jjceron@um.es.
Christophe HirtzLBPC/PPC - IRMB, CHU de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier University, 80 rue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier, France.
Inserm · FRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

Fundación Séneca 19894/GERM/15Universidad de Murcia R- 605/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the sAA proteoforms' expression during different stimulation situations. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study evaluated the salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) proteoforms' behavior by western blot (WB) analysis and high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in different situations that produce increases in sAA activity. For this purpose, six healthy women with a similar body mass index, age, and fit, underwent different sAA stimulation tests, such as acetic acid stimulation, psychological stress using the standardized Trier social stress test, and physical effort using the Cooper treadmill test.

resultsThe three models showed an increase in sAA activity. The WB demonstrated seven common bands observed in the six women (band one at 59 kDa, two at 56 kDa, three at 48 kDa, four at 45 kDa, five at 41 kDa, six at 36 kDa, and seven at 14 kDa), in which sAA protein was identified. The individual WB analysis showed that band two, which corresponded to the native non-glycosylated sAA proteoform, had a higher increase after the three sAA stimulation inducers, and this band was also the only proteoform correlated with sAA activity (r = 0.56, P = 0.001). In addition, when the label-free quantification analysis was performed, the different proteoforms showed different responses depending on the type of stimulation.

conclusionsThis preliminary study showed that the diverse sAA proteoforms' expression depends on the different stimulation models. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study opens new perspectives and challenges for the use of the different alpha-amylase proteoforms as possible biomarkers in addition to the sAA activity.

Indexed as

SalivaSalivary alpha-AmylasesChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansStress, PsychologicalTandem Mass SpectrometrySalivary alpha-AmylasesInter-individual variabilityProteoformsSalivary alpha-amylaseStress

Identifiers

PMID31388762
OpenAlexW2964725654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.