Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388757›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019

[Unmet research and developmental needs in ophthalmology : A consensus-based road map of the European Vision Institute for 2019-2025].

C Cursiefen, F Cordeiro, J Cunha-Vaz, T Wheeler-Schilling, H P N Scholl, das EVI Steering Board

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C CursiefenZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland. claus.cursiefen@uk-koeln.de.
F CordeiroImperial College London, London, Großbritannien.
J Cunha-VazAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Coimbra, Portugal.
T Wheeler-SchillingEuropean Vision Institute (EVI), Brüssel, Belgien.
H P N SchollInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Basel, Schweiz.
das EVI Steering Board

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo define unmet needs in ophthalmology which can realistically be addressed in the next years (2019-2025) and to describe potential avenues for research to address these challenges.

methodsOutcomes of a consensus process within the European Vision Institute (EVI, Brussels) are outlined. Disease areas which are discussed comprise glaucoma, retinal dystrophies, diabetic retinopathy, dry eye disease, corneal diseases, cataract and refractive surgery.

resultsUnmet needs in the mentioned disease areas are discussed and realistically achievable research projects outlined.

conclusionConsiderable progress can be made in the field of ophthalmology and patient-relevant outcomes in the near future.

Indexed as

CataractGlaucomaOphthalmologyConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHumansVision, OcularForthcoming challengesOphthalmologyResearchResearch and developmental needsRoad map

Identifiers

PMID31388757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.