ReviewRheumatology international2019
Refractory Takayasu arteritis successfully treated with rituximab: case-based review.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Glimpse into Humoral Response and Related Therapeutic Approaches of Takayasu's Arteritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Active withdrawal of corticosteroids using tocilizumab and its association with autoantibody profiles in relapsed Takayasu arteritis: a multicentre, single-arm, prospective study (the Ab-TAK study).Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Common Autoantibody among Takayasu Arteritis and Ulcerative Colitis: A Possible Pathophysiology That Includes Gut-Vessel Connection in Vascular Inflammation.JMA journal · 2023Review
- Novel Therapies in Takayasu Arteritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Pathogenesis of liver injury in Takayasu arteritis: advanced understanding leads to new horizons.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis-Current and Future.Current rheumatology reports · 2020Review
- [Treatment of Takayasu arteritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2020Review
- Migratory Aortitis Associated with Granulocyte-colony-stimulating Factor.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a subtype of the large-vessel vasculitis, affecting the aorta and its major branches. Although T cell-mediated autoimmunity is mainly involved in vascular inflammation, in recent years, accumulating evidence suggests the important role of B cells in the pathogenesis and effectiveness of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab (RTX), a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in refractory TAK. Herein, we report for the first time a case involving a 34-year-old man with TAK who was refractory to four different biologic agents, such as one selective T-cell co-stimulation modulator (abatacept), one anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab), and two tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (infliximab and etanercept), but eventually achieved remission with RTX. He received a total of six courses of RTX, and doses of prednisolone and methotrexate were tapered without relapse. The current case provided further evidence to the potential role of RTX therapy in patients with refractory TAK, and its efficacy needs to be validated in a controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.