Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388735›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2020

[Analysis of referral diagnoses to the rheumatology department].

T Hoffmann, P Oelzner, J Böttcher, G Wolf, A Pfeil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T HoffmannKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
P OelznerKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
J BöttcherInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Deutschland.
G WolfKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
A PfeilKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. alexander.pfeil@med.uni-jena.de.
Jena University Hospital · DESRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe initial presentation of patients with symptoms indicative of a rheumatic disease is in most cases not directly to a rheumatologist. This study evaluated the following questions: I. Which medical specialists refer patients to a department of rheumatology? II. Evaluation of the accordance of the presumptive referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis by a rheumatologist.

methodsA total of 947 patients (279 men and 668 women) who initially presented to a university hospital for rheumatological diagnostics were included in the study. The referring medical specialist fields were identified. Furthermore, a kappa analysis was performed to evaluate the accordance of the presumptive referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis generated after a rheumatological evaluation of the patients.

resultsOf the referrals 73% were initiated by general practitioners or internists functioning as general practitioners. The other referrers were 5% specialists in internal medicine (excluding rheumatology), 4% orthopedic/trauma surgeons, 1% other surgeons and 4% other specialist fields. A rheumatological diagnosis was made in 58% of the patients and rheumatological inflammatory joint diseases (26%), collagenosis (14%) and vasculitides (5%) were the most frequently diagnoses. The accordance of the presumptive diagnosis of the general practitioners and the final diagnosis after rheumatological evaluation was a kappa coefficient of κ = 0.304. Lower kappa values were evaluated for orthopedic surgeons (κ = 0.277) and other specialists (κ = 0.200).

conclusionThe referrals to a rheumatology institution were frequently initiated by general practitioners and internists functioning as general practitioners. In this context the presumptive diagnosis of general practitioners showed a low accordance with the final rheumatological diagnosis. In contrast, a detailed presumptive diagnosis is desirable for optimal use of the limited resources for rheumatological care.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationRheumatic DiseasesRheumatologyFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleRheumatologistsAccordanceDiagnosisGeneral practionerReferrersRheumatic disease

Identifiers

PMID31388735
OpenAlexW2965925341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.