Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388721›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Comparative dosimetry between

Alexandre Jadoul, Claire Bernard, Pierre Lovinfosse, Laurent Gérard, Henri Lilet, Olivier Cornet, Roland Hustinx

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictive value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Utility of pre-procedural [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre JadoulDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liege, B35 Domaine Universitaire du Sart-Tilman, 4000, Liege, Belgium. ajadoul@chuliege.be.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-6080
Claire BernardDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liege, B35 Domaine Universitaire du Sart-Tilman, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Pierre LovinfosseDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liege, B35 Domaine Universitaire du Sart-Tilman, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Laurent GérardDivision of Radiology, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Henri LiletDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liege, B35 Domaine Universitaire du Sart-Tilman, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Olivier CornetDivision of Radiology, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Roland HustinxDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liege, B35 Domaine Universitaire du Sart-Tilman, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
University of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study is to determine whether MATERIAL AND

methodsFifty-seven patients who underwent selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) were retrospectively included in the study, for a total of 59 treatments. Nineteen HCC were treated by resin microspheres (HCC-SIR), 20 HCC with glass microspheres (HCC-Thera), and 20 liver metastases with resin microspheres (Metastases-SIR). The mean absorbed doses in tumoral liver (Dm) and non-tumoral liver (DmNTL) were determined on the

resultsDmNTL was < 50 Gy in the 3 groups, with a strong correlation in all population, albeit slightly lower in Metastases-SIR than HCC-SIR and HCC-Thera (CCC 0.8, 0.94 and 0.96, respectively). In tumoral liver, Dm was higher in HCC than metastases (159 ± 117 Gy versus 63 ± 31 Gy).

conclusion

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularEmbolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsHumansMicrospheresPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesTechnetium Tc 99m Aggregated AlbuminTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonYttrium RadioisotopesTechnetium Tc 99m Aggregated AlbuminYttrium RadioisotopesDosimetryHepatocarcinomaLiver metastasesMicrospheresRadioembolization

Identifiers

PMID31388721
OpenAlexW2966802385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.