Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388637›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2019

Feasibility study for a randomized clinical trial of bupivacaine, lidocaine with adrenaline, or placebo wound infiltration to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A T Adenekan, A A Aderounmu, F O Wuraola, A M Owojuyigbe, A O Adetoye, D Nepogodiev, L Magill, A Bhangu, A O Adisa

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Post-Cholecystectomy Pain.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Laparoscopic Management of Gall Bladder Diseases in Nigeria: A Systematic Review.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

A T AdenekanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife Nigeria.
A A AderounmuDepartment of Surgery Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex Ile-Ife Nigeria.
F O WuraolaDepartment of Surgery Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex Ile-Ife Nigeria.
A M OwojuyigbeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife Nigeria.
A O AdetoyeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife Nigeria.
D NepogodievNational Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2171-2862
L MagillNational Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
A BhanguNational Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
A O AdisaDepartment of Surgery Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-3992
Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex · NGNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Short-term pain relief can be achieved by local anaesthetic infiltration of port sites at the end of laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to assess feasibility of performing an RCT to evaluate short-term postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic surgery in Nigeria using two local anaesthetics for port-site infiltration Methods: This was a placebo-controlled, patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, external feasibility RCT. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic ultrasound-proven gallstones were randomized into three groups: lidocaine with adrenaline (epinephrine), bupivacaine or saline control. The feasibility of recruitment, compliance with randomized treatment allocation, and completion of pain and nausea outcome measures were evaluated. Pain was assessed at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery using a 0-10-point numerical rating scale (NRS) and a four-point verbal rating scale. Nausea was assessed using NRS at the same time points. Clinical outcomes were assessed only in patients who received the correct randomized treatment allocation. Results: Of 79 patients screened for eligibility, 69 were consented and randomized (23 per group). Overall, compliance with randomized treatment allocation was achieved in 64 patients (93 per cent). All pain and nausea assessments were completed in these 64 patients. On the NRS, most patients had moderate to severe pain at 2 h (39 of 64, 61 per cent), which gradually reduced. Only six patients (9 per cent) had moderate to severe pain at 24 h. Conclusion: Recruitment, compliance with the randomized allocation, and completion of pain outcome measures were satisfactory. This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a surgical RCT in a resource-limited setting. Registration number: ISRCTN 17667918 (https://www.isrctn.com).

Indexed as

BupivacaineEpinephrineLidocainePostoperative PainAdultAnesthetics, LocalCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholelithiasisDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVasoconstrictor AgentsAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineEpinephrineLidocaineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID31388637
PMCPMC6677102
OpenAlexW2923059187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.