Trial reportBJS open2019
Feasibility study for a randomized clinical trial of bupivacaine, lidocaine with adrenaline, or placebo wound infiltration to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial report in BJS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Post-Cholecystectomy Pain.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsTrial
- The Impact of Opioid-Sparing Analgesia on Postoperative Pain and Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Management of Gall Bladder Diseases in Nigeria: A Systematic Review.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Short-term pain relief can be achieved by local anaesthetic infiltration of port sites at the end of laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to assess feasibility of performing an RCT to evaluate short-term postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic surgery in Nigeria using two local anaesthetics for port-site infiltration Methods: This was a placebo-controlled, patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, external feasibility RCT. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic ultrasound-proven gallstones were randomized into three groups: lidocaine with adrenaline (epinephrine), bupivacaine or saline control. The feasibility of recruitment, compliance with randomized treatment allocation, and completion of pain and nausea outcome measures were evaluated. Pain was assessed at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery using a 0-10-point numerical rating scale (NRS) and a four-point verbal rating scale. Nausea was assessed using NRS at the same time points. Clinical outcomes were assessed only in patients who received the correct randomized treatment allocation. Results: Of 79 patients screened for eligibility, 69 were consented and randomized (23 per group). Overall, compliance with randomized treatment allocation was achieved in 64 patients (93 per cent). All pain and nausea assessments were completed in these 64 patients. On the NRS, most patients had moderate to severe pain at 2 h (39 of 64, 61 per cent), which gradually reduced. Only six patients (9 per cent) had moderate to severe pain at 24 h. Conclusion: Recruitment, compliance with the randomized allocation, and completion of pain outcome measures were satisfactory. This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a surgical RCT in a resource-limited setting. Registration number: ISRCTN 17667918 (https://www.isrctn.com).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.