Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388601›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Rationale and design of a feasibility and acceptability RCT of romantic partner and support figure attendance during bariatric surgery visits.

Megan Ferriby, Keeley Pratt, Lorraine Wallace, Brian C Focht, Sabrena Noria, Bradley Needleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan FerribyDepartment of Human Sciences, Human Development and Family Sciences Program, The Ohio State University, United States.
Keeley PrattDepartment of Human Sciences, Human Development and Family Sciences Program, The Ohio State University, United States.
Lorraine WallaceDepartment of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, Division of Biomedical Education, The Ohio State University, United States.
Brian C FochtDepartment of Human Sciences, Kinesiology Program, The Ohio State University, United States.
Sabrena NoriaDepartment of Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Ohio State University, United States.
Bradley NeedlemanDepartment of Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Ohio State University, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As US obesity rates increase, more patients, particularly females, are seeking out bariatric surgery. As bariatric surgery patients' social supports have been vastly understudied, clinicians and researchers have limited information about how to include support figures, including romantic partners, in the surgery process. To address this gap in knowledge, we are conducting a four-arm randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy for the inclusion of romantic partners and support figures throughout the bariatric surgery process for a group of 110 women age 18 years or older. Patients will be randomized based upon their cohabitating romantic relationships at baseline. Female patients who have a cohabitating romantic partner will be randomized to one of two arms: partner attended (PA), and partner attended treatment as usual (PA-TU). To provide greater detail about social support during the bariatric process, interested patients (female or male) not in cohabitating romantic relationships will be randomized into support figure attended (SFA) and SFA-TU arms. Four data collection points are planned, including 4-months pre-surgery, 2 weeks pre-surgery, 2 weeks and 2-months post-surgery. Feasibility and acceptability of support figure/partner attendance collected at the final data point. Patients and support figures/partners will complete weight status, health behaviors, support for behavior change and relationship quality assessments at each time point. The rationale, design, theoretical framework, and methodology for the study are described. The results of this study will identify how support figures/partners influence patients' health behavior change and weight loss, and how relationships change over the surgery process.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryBMI, Body Mass IndexBS, Bariatric SurgeryPA, Partner AttendedPA-TU, Partner Attended Treatment as UsualRandomized control trialRomantic relationshipsSFA, Support Figure AttendedSFA-TU, Support Figure Attended – Treatment as UsualSocial support

Identifiers

PMID31388601
PMCPMC6676458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.