Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388568›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2019

Quality assuring "Plan of the day" selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module.

Emma Patel, Yat Tsang, Angela Baker, Jenny Callender, Shaista Hafeez, Emma Hall, Vibeke Nordmark Hansen, Rebecca Lewis, Helen McNair, Elizabeth Miles and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Recognising the challenges of implementing multi-centre adaptive plan of the day radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  4. Pathway for radiation therapists online advanced adapter training and credentialing.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma PatelRadiotherapy Physics Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Yat TsangNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom.
Angela BakerOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jenny CallenderUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Shaista HafeezDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Vibeke Nordmark HansenDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca LewisClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Helen McNairDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth MilesNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom.
Robert HuddartDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14744Cancer Research UK 19727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeHypofractionated bladder RT with or without image guided adaptive planning (HYBRID) is a multicentre clinical trial investigating "Plan of the Day" (PoD) adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer. To ensure correct PoD selection a pre-accrual guidance and assessment module was developed as part of an image guided radiotherapy quality assurance (IGRT QA) credentialing programme. This study aimed to evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness across multiple recruiting centres. MATERIALS AND

methodsIndividuals from participating centres remotely accessed an image database in order to complete the PoD module. An assessment score of ≥83% was required in order to receive QA approval. A questionnaire was used to gather user feedback on the module. PoD decisions for the first patient at each recruiting centre were retrospectively reviewed for protocol adherence.

results71 radiation therapists (RTTs) from 10 centres completed the PoD module. The median assessment score was 92% (Range: 58-100%) with 79% of RTTs passing the assessment on first attempt. All questionnaire respondents reported that the PoD module prepared them for plan selection. In 51/60 of on-trial treatments reviewed, the PoD selected by the centre agreed with QA reviewers.

conclusionsThe PoD QA module was successfully implemented in a multicentre trial and enabled pre-accrual assessment of protocol understanding. This increased operator confidence and resulted in appropriate PoD selection on-trial.

Indexed as

AdaptiveBladderIGRTRadiotherapyTrial QA

Identifiers

PMID31388568
PMCPMC6675972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.