Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388474›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies.

Dongwan D Kang, Feng Li, Edward Kirton, Ashleigh Thomas, Rob Egan, Hong An, Zhong Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07169123 (Protease Regulation and Impact of Sodium as Mechanisms of Inflammation in IBD), which is not on this map. Cited by 2,170 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,170citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07169123 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Protease Regulation and Impact of Sodium as Mechanisms of Inflammation in IBD

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2025 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsCrohns Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,170 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Science advances · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High dietary BGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongwan D KangDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Feng LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Edward KirtonDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1974-1768
Ashleigh ThomasDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-5649
Rob EganDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7080-7801
Hong AnSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhong WangDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-0458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported on MetaBAT, an automated metagenome binning software tool to reconstruct single genomes from microbial communities for subsequent analyses of uncultivated microbial species. MetaBAT has become one of the most popular binning tools largely due to its computational efficiency and ease of use, especially in binning experiments with a large number of samples and a large assembly. MetaBAT requires users to choose parameters to fine-tune its sensitivity and specificity. If those parameters are not chosen properly, binning accuracy can suffer, especially on assemblies of poor quality. Here, we developed MetaBAT 2 to overcome this problem. MetaBAT 2 uses a new adaptive binning algorithm to eliminate manual parameter tuning. We also performed extensive software engineering optimization to increase both computational and memory efficiency. Comparing MetaBAT 2 to alternative software tools on over 100 real world metagenome assemblies shows superior accuracy and computing speed. Binning a typical metagenome assembly takes only a few minutes on a single commodity workstation. We therefore recommend the community adopts MetaBAT 2 for their metagenome binning experiments. MetaBAT 2 is open source software and available at https://bitbucket.org/berkeleylab/metabat.

Indexed as

ClusteringMetagenome binningMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID31388474
PMCPMC6662567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.