ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019
Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-tracking biomarkers for glaucoma based on saccadic reaction time: a controlled clinical study.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Diagnostics and rehabilitation of post-stroke visual field loss using innovative visual field evaluation. The impact of losing driving privileges (DRIVE-study): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Where you didn't look: Perimetry based on the analysis of free-viewing gaze behavior while watching movie clips.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Saccadic Reaction Times and Computational Modelling Reveal Heterogeneous Binocular Summation in Glaucomatous Visual Fields.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Reversibly Desensitising the Human Retina to Delay Saccadic Reaction Time for Diagnostic Prototyping.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Using continuous visual stimulus tracking for detecting visual function loss due to acquired brain injury.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Optimising reaction-time analysis in eye movement perimetry using pooled promptness distributions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- Detecting and Quantifying Glaucomatous Visual Function Loss With Continuous Visual Stimulus Tracking: A Case-Control Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Inhibitory control and working memory using saccadic eye movements in primary glaucoma.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Effect of ethnic diversity on the saccadic reaction time among healthy Indian and Dutch adults.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Effect of Stimulus Contrast and Spatial Position on Saccadic Eye Movement Parameters.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Eye Movement Abnormalities in Glaucoma Patients: A Review.Eye and brain · 2022Review
- Saccadic reaction time in mirror image sectors across horizontal meridian in eye movement perimetry.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Slowed Saccadic Reaction Times in Seemingly Normal Parts of Glaucomatous Visual Fields.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn eye movement perimetry (EMP), the extent of the visual field is tested by assessing the saccades using an eye tracker. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of age and sex of the subjects, the eccentricity and intensity of the peripheral stimuli on saccadic reaction time (SRT), and the interaction between these parameters in healthy participants.
methodsHealthy participants aged between 20 to 70 years underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and an EMP test. SRT was determined from detected peripheral stimuli of four intensity levels. A multilevel mixed-model analysis was used to verify the influence of subject and stimulus characteristics on SRT within the tested visual field.
resultsNinety-five subjects (mean age 43.0 [15.0] years) were included. Age, stimulus intensity, and eccentricity had a statistically significant effect on SRT, not sex. SRTs were significantly faster with increasing stimulus intensity and decreasing eccentricity (
conclusionsThe current study demonstrated significant SRT dependence across the visual field measured up to 27°, irrespective of sex. The presented SRT values may serve as a first normative guide for EMP. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This report of SRT interaction can aid in refining its use as a measure of visual field responsiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.