Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388460›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2019

Venous-to-arterial pCO

Pierre Huette, Omar Ellouze, Osama Abou-Arab, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can perioperative pCOJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024
    Trial
  2. Central Venous-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference (pCOIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Lactate and COFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Central venous-to-arterial COCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021
    Article
  9. ΔPCOFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Performance of Lactate and COFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre HuetteAnaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Cardiothoracic ICU, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Omar EllouzeAnaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Cardiovascular ICU, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Osama Abou-ArabAnaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Cardiothoracic ICU, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Pierre-Grégoire GuinotAnaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Cardiovascular ICU, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRMaison des Sciences de l’Homme de Dijon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alteration of tissue perfusion is a main contributor to organ dysfunction in high-risk surgical patients. The difference between venous carbon dioxide and arterial carbon dioxide pressure (pCO

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary bypasshigh-risk surgerypostoperative complicationsVenous-to-arterial pCO2 difference

Identifiers

PMID31388460
PMCPMC6642915
OpenAlexW2943058444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.