ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2019
How can CO
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05679778 (PCO2 Gab as a Marker of Tissue Adequacy of Cardiac Output in Sever Shock State, Compared to Other Tissue Perfusion Indicators.), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PCO2 Gab as a Marker of Tissue Adequacy of Cardiac Output in Sever Shock State, Compared to Other Tissue Perfusion Indicators.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiology, monitoring, and optimisation of perioperative tissue oxygenation: a narrative review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Review
- Real-time prediction of cardiorespiratory deterioration during paediatric critical care transport using interpretable machine learning.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Physiological determinants and the red blood cells transfusion decision-making process in non-bleeding critically ill patients: a comprehensive narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Veno-arterial COIntensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Jugular bulb venous to arterial carbon dioxide gradient is associated with treatment-responsive phenotypes of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Point of View: A Holistic Four-Interface Conceptual Model for Personalizing Shock Resuscitation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- The Evolution of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference (PCOIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Venous Minus Arterial Carbon Dioxide Gradients in the Monitoring of Tissue Perfusion and Oxygenation: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Use of COJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- How I personalize fluid therapy in septic shock?Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Capnodynamics - noninvasive cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation monitoring in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Prognostic Value of PCO2 Gap in Adult Septic Shock Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2022Article
- Treatment of Hyperlactatemia in Acute Circulatory Failure Based on COFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- The role of peripheral perfusion markers and lactate in septic shock resuscitation.Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Review
- Effects of Low Protein-High Carbohydrate Diet during Early and Late Pregnancy on Respiratory Quotient and Visceral Adiposity.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Pathophysiology and clinical implications of the veno-arterial PCOCritical care (London, England) · 2021Review
- Hemodynamic Monitoring in Sepsis-A Conceptual Framework of Macro- and Microcirculatory Alterations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Central venous-to-arterial COCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the adequacy of oxygen delivery with oxygen requirements is one of the key-goal of haemodynamic resuscitation. Clinical examination, lactate and central or mixed venous oxygen saturation (S
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.