ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2019
HBV DNA Test Among Blood Donations May Require Two Amplification Targets.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant Assay Compared to Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant Assay and Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV Assay in Plasma Samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Comparison of four extraction methods for the detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in dried blood spot samples.MicrobiologyOpen · 2021Article
- Molecular characteristics of HBV infection among blood donors tested HBsAg reactive in a single ELISA test in southern China.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze the risk and reason of false-negative HBV DNA results of NAT reagents among blood donations of China and discuss the necessity of two amplification targets for HBV DNA tests among donations. In this study, samples that showed discordant results on two commercially available assay platforms were further detected by established in-house methods based on conserved regions of the HBV genome. The HBV concentration of these samples was determined using two commercially available reagents. The samples with high titers of HBV were detected by an in-house method. The samples showing high Ct differences between two regions in the in-house method were further sequenced and aligned with primers and probes. The results showed that the established method has a good detection performance. The mismatch between reverse primers and sample sequences led to decreased detection capacity of S and C regions by the in-house method, but it could be compensated by another region. Among the false-negative samples detected by commercial reagents, most were because of low titers; however, there were 7 samples with HBV DNA concentrations much higher than the LOD of the commercial reagents, which may be due to mismatch of the primer or probe. This study highlights the potential risk of HBV false-negative detection by commercial NAT reagents. The dual-target assay may be helpful for HBV screening and reduce the risk of false-negative detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.