Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388251›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2019

Review of the Abstracts on Advances in Transfusion Medicine at Hematocon 2018.

Suchet Sachdev, Ratti Ram Sharma, Neelam Marwaha

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suchet SachdevDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6179-4885
Ratti Ram SharmaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Neelam MarwahaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research issues are gradually being focussed upon in the fast evolving discipline of blood transfusion services (BTS), that was initially focussed on development of a safe and adequate blood and blood component supply. The poster presentations of ongoing research in the BTS at the Haematocon 2018 dwelt upon the knowledge, attitude and practice studies with reference to voluntary blood donation, analysis of the reasons for blood donor deferral, role of donor infectious disease screening towards early clinical intervention in the asymptomatic blood donor, the clinical trigger for red blood cells transfusion and its effect on length of stay in hospital and morbidity, maximum surgical blood ordering schedule, massive transfusion and alloimmunization apart from granulocyte transfusion and internal audit of platelet usage in BTS. Research across all dimensions of the BTS covering the entire spectrum from donors' vein to the recipients' completing the "vein to vein" transfusion chain in the Indian context will help generate evidence to lay a sound foundation for the blood services.

Indexed as

Knowledge attitude and practiceMassive transfusionsMaximum surgical blood ordering scheduleNational blood policyVoluntary blood donation

Identifiers

PMID31388251
PMCPMC6646633
OpenAlexW2944554554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.