Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388214›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2019

Comparing Bioremediation Approaches for Agricultural Soil Affected with Petroleum Crude: A Case Study.

Sunita Varjani, Vivek N Upasani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sunita VarjaniGujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382010 India.ORCID 0000-0001-6966-7768
Vivek N Upasani2Department of Microbiology, M. G. Science Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of work was to check and make comparison of efficacy for five approaches for petroleum crude contaminated agricultural soil remediation by making use of soil microcosms. Concerning the published literature in our information, this is the first report comparing five approaches i.e. abiotic losses, native microbial flora, nutrient amendments and pre-adapted native microbial culture and concurrent amendments of nutrients + pre-adapted native microbial culture for agricultural soil bioremediation using

Indexed as

AgricultureIndigenous microorganismsNutrient amendmentP. aeruginosa NCIM 5514Soil microcosmWeathering effects

Identifiers

PMID31388214
PMCPMC6646639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.