Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31388136›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Convolutional Neural Networks for Spectroscopic Analysis in Retinal Oximetry.

Damon T DePaoli, Prudencio Tossou, Martin Parent, Dominic Sauvageau, Daniel C Côté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Test-retest repeatability in macular retinal oximetry.Clinical & experimental optometry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeted spectroscopy in the eye fundus.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in Retinal Oximetry.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Review
  11. Rise of Raman spectroscopy in neurosurgery: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damon T DePaoliUniversité Laval, CERVO Brain Research Center, Neuroscience, Quebec City, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Prudencio TossouUniversité Laval, Department of software engineering and informatics, Quebec city, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Martin ParentUniversité Laval, CERVO Brain Research Center, Neuroscience, Quebec City, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Dominic SauvageauZilia inc., Quebec City, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Daniel C CôtéUniversité Laval, CERVO Brain Research Center, Neuroscience, Quebec City, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada. dccote@cervo.ulaval.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal oximetry is a non-invasive technique to investigate the hemodynamics, vasculature and health of the eye. Current techniques for retinal oximetry have been plagued by quantitatively inconsistent measurements and this has greatly limited their adoption in clinical environments. To become clinically relevant oximetry measurements must become reliable and reproducible across studies and locations. To this end, we have developed a convolutional neural network algorithm for multi-wavelength oximetry, showing a greatly improved calculation performance in comparison to previously reported techniques. The algorithm is calibration free, performs sensing of the four main hemoglobin conformations with no prior knowledge of their characteristic absorption spectra and, due to the convolution-based calculation, is invariable to spectral shifting. We show, herein, the dramatic performance improvements in using this algorithm to deduce effective oxygenation (SO

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerDatasets as TopicGlaucomaHumansOximetryOxygenRetinaRetinal DiseasesRetinal VesselsSpectrum AnalysisOxygen

Identifiers

PMID31388136
PMCPMC6684811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.