ArticleScientific reports2019
Machine Learning Allows Calibration Models to Predict Trace Element Concentration in Soils with Generalized LIBS Spectra.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for quantitative LIBS analysis of aluminum alloys: a comparison of random forest, gradient boosting, and extremely randomized trees.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metal contamination - a global environmental issue: sources, implications & advances in mitigation.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Quantitative Analysis of Pb in Soil Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Based on Signal Enhancement of Conductive Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of conformation and intramolecular interactions on vibrational circular dichroism spectra identified with machine learning.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Separation of Leather, Synthetic Leather and Polymers Using Handheld Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Spectroscopy Using a 2-Stage, Generalized Constituent Contribution Protocol.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- From machine learning to transfer learning in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis of rocks for Mars exploration.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Machine learning-based LIBS spectrum analysis of human blood plasma allows ovarian cancer diagnosis.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determination of trace elements in soils with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is significantly affected by the matrix effect, due to large variations in chemical composition and physical property of different soils. Spectroscopic data treatment with univariate models often leads to poor analytical performances. We have developed in this work a multivariate model using machine learning algorithms based on a back-propagation neural network (BPNN). Beyond the classical chemometry approach, machine learning, with tremendous progresses the last years especially for image processing, is offering an ensemble of powerful and constantly renewed algorithms and tools efficient for the different steps in the construction of a spectroscopic data treatment model, including feature selection and neural network training. Considering the matrix effect as the focus of this work, we have developed the concept of generalized spectrum, where the information about the soil matrix is explicitly included in the input vector of the model as an additional dimension. After a brief presentation of the experimental procedure and the results of regression with a univariate model, the development of the multivariate model will be described in detail together with its analytical performances, showing average relative errors of calibration (REC) and of prediction (REP) within the range of 5-6%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.