Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31387983›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Development and Validation of Risk Nomogram Model Predicting Coronary Microvascular Obstruction in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Catheterization.

Yuyang Xiao, Xianghua Fu, Yanbo Wang, Yanqiang Wu, Wenlu Wang, Qian Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuyang XiaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Xianghua FuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Yanbo WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Yanqiang WuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Wenlu WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Qian ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Hebei Medical University · CNSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Coronary microvascular functional and structural obstruction (CMVO) remains a major complication in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study was designed to develop and validate a nomogram model to predict CMVO risk during primary percutaneous catheterization procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Starting January 2014 to December 2016, a cohort of eligible candidates were enrolled and divided into a training or a validation database. Each database was divided into MO or NMO subgroups based on TIMI myocardial perfusion grade results after recanalization. Independent factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression, from which the nomogram was plotted. The echocardiography measurement of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was arranged within 7 days after the procedure. RESULTS A nomogram was built for CMVO risk prediction for the first time. There were 446 participants in the training database with 319 cases in the NMO subgroup and 127 participants in the MO subgroup. The validation database included 99 participants with 25 cases in the NMO subgroup and 74 in the MO subgroup. The risk model was developed by 6 independently significant factors: age, symptom onset to balloon time, Killip classification, admission activated clotting time, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and glucose value. Internal receiver operating characteristic displayed favorable performance with concordance index of 0.925, while external validation area under curve was 0.939. There were significant differences in LVEF values during hospitalization between the subgroups of each database (both P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The nomogram model consisting of 6 factors could predict CMVO risk accurately for STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous catheterization.

Indexed as

AgedChinaCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationCoronary OcclusionEchocardiographyFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMicrovesselsMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNomogramsPercutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identifiers

PMID31387983
PMCPMC6693363
OpenAlexW2964889881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.