ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019
Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Success versus failure in cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Unsupervised visual learning is revealed for task-irrelevant natural scenes due to reduced attentional suppression effects in visual areas.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Predictive Distractor Processing Relies on Integrated Proactive and Reactive Attentional Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Contextual Updating in Attentional Orienting Relies on the Right Temporoparietal Junction: Evidence From rTMS.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Anticipatory and reactive mechanisms of habituation to visual distractors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Topography of Functional Organization of Beat Perception in Human Premotor Cortex: Causal Evidence From a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Study.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Same, Same but Different? A Multi-Method Review of the Processes Underlying Executive Control.Neuropsychology review · 2024Review
- Article
- Pupil Dilation and Microsaccades Provide Complementary Insights into the Dynamics of Arousal and Instantaneous Attention during Effortful Listening.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates alerting and executive control processes in attention.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates visuospatial distractor suppression.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
- Commentary: Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Role of the dorsal attention network in distracter suppression based on features.Cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In visual search, the presence of a salient, yet task-irrelevant, distractor in the stimulus array interferes with target selection and slows down performance. Neuroimaging data point to a key role of the frontoparietal dorsal attention network in dealing with visual distractors; however, the respective roles of different nodes within the network and their hemispheric specialization are still unresolved. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evaluate the causal role of two key regions of the dorsal attention network in resisting attentional capture by a salient singleton distractor: the frontal eye field (FEF) and the cortex within the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The task of the participants (male/female human volunteers) was to discriminate the pointing direction of a target arrow while ignoring a task-irrelevant salient distractor. Immediately after stimulus onset, triple-pulse 10 Hz TMS was delivered either to IPS or FEF on either side of the brain. Results indicated that TMS over the right FEF significantly reduced the behavioral cost engendered by the salient distractor relative to left FEF stimulation. No such effect was obtained with stimulation of IPS on either side of brain. Interestingly, this FEF-dependent reduction in distractor interference interacted with the contingent trial history, being maximal when no distractor was present on the previous trial relative to when there was one. Our results provide direct causal evidence that the right FEF houses key mechanisms for distractor filtering, pointing to a pivotal role of the frontal cortex of the right hemisphere in limiting interference from an irrelevant but attention-grabbing stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.