Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31387878›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Sex Differences and Effects of Predictive Cues on Delayed Punishment Discounting.

Anna E Liley, Daniel B K Gabriel, Helen J Sable, Nicholas W Simon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Disinhibition of ventral tegmental area during initial punishment learning causes enduring punishment insensitivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. The role of ovarian hormones in risk aversion in female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex differences in sensitivity to dopamine receptor manipulations of risk-based decision making in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural Mechanisms Mediating Sex Differences in Motivation for Reward: Cognitive Bias, Food, Gambling, and Drugs of Abuse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna E LileyDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152.
Daniel B K GabrielDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152.
Helen J SableDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152.
Nicholas W SimonDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152 Nwsimon@memphis.edu.
University of Memphis · US

Funding

Identifying the neurophysiological basis of risky decision-makingR15DA046797 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI SIMON, NICHOLAS W · 2019 to 2019
$396k
NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA046797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of the research studying punishment has focused on an aversive stimulus delivered immediately after an action. However, in real-world decision-making, negative consequences often occur long after a decision has been made. This can engender myopic decisions that fail to appropriately respond to consequences. Whereas discounting of delayed rewards has been well studied in both human and animal models, systematic discounting of delayed consequences remains largely unexplored. To address this gap in the literature, we developed the delayed punishment decision-making task. Rats chose between a small, single-pellet reinforcer and a large, three-pellet reinforcer accompanied by a mild foot shock. The shock was preceded by a delay, which systematically increased throughout the session (0, 4, 8, 12, 16 s). On average, rats discounted the negative value of delayed punishment, as indicated by increased choice of the large, punished reward as the delay preceding the shock lengthened. Female rats discounted delayed punishment less than males, and this behavior was not influenced by estrous cycling. The addition of a cue light significantly decreased the undervaluation of delayed consequences for both sexes. Finally, there was no correlation between the discounting of delayed punishments and a traditional reward delay discounting task for either sex. These data indicate that the ability of punishment to regulate decision-making is attenuated when punishment occurs later in time. This task provides an avenue for exploration of the neural circuitry underlying the devaluation of delayed punishment and may assist in developing treatments for substance use disorders.

Indexed as

CuesDelay DiscountingRewardSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiobehavioral SciencesConditioning, OperantElectroshockFemaleMalePunishmentRats, Long-Evanscuesdecision-makingdelay discountingestrouspunishmentsex differences

Identifiers

PMID31387878
PMCPMC6709237
OpenAlexW2966617664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.