Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31387609›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2019

Development and validation of a Brief Diet Quality Assessment Tool in the French-speaking adults from Quebec.

J Lafrenière, S Harrison, D Laurin, C Brisson, D Talbot, P Couture, S Lemieux, B Lamarche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dietary intervention among young cancer survivors within the CARE for CAYA program.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Penn Healthy Diet survey: pilot validation and scoring.The British journal of nutrition · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J LafrenièreInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
S HarrisonInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
D LaurinInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
C BrissonPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Laval University Research Center, Québec, Canada.
D TalbotPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Laval University Research Center, Québec, Canada.
P CoutureInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
S LemieuxInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
B LamarcheInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Québec, Canada. benoit.lamarche@fsaa.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-5378
Université Laval · CAThe Quebec Population Health Research Network · CACentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval · CA

Funding

CIHR 201109MOP-257818-PH2-CFBA-35698CIHR 201309MOP-312916-PH1-CFBA-35698CIHR 201403 MOP-325244-BCA-CFBA-52569CIHR 201603PJT-366272-PJT-CFBA-35698CIHR FHG 129921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to develop and validate a short, self-administered questionnaire to assess diet quality in clinical settings, using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) as reference.

methodsA total of 1040 men and women (aged 44.6 ± 14.4 y) completed a validated web-based food frequency questionnaire (webFFQ) and had their height and weight measured (development sample). Participants were categorized arbitrarily according to diet quality (high: AHEI score ≥ 65/110, low: AHEI score < 65/110) based on dietary intake data from the webFFQ. The Brief Diet Quality Assessment Tool was developed using a classification and regression tree (CART) approach and individual answers to the webFFQ among participants considered to have a plausible energy intake (ratio of reported energy intake to basal metabolic rate ≥ 1.2 and < 2.4; n = 1040). A second sample of 3344 older adults (aged 66.5 ± 6.4 y) was used to test the external validity of the Brief Diet Quality Assessment Tool (external validation sample).

resultsThe decision tree included sequences of 3 to 6 binary questions, yielding 21 different pathways classifying diet quality as being high or low. In the development sample, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the predictive model was 0.92, with sensitivity, specificity and agreement values of 89.5, 83.9 and 87.2%. Compared with individuals having a low-quality diet according to the Brief Diet Quality Assessment Tool (mean AHEI 56.7 ± 11.4), individuals classified as having a high-quality diet (mean AHEI 71.3 ± 11.0) were significantly older, and had lower BMI, percent body fat and waist circumference, and had lower blood pressure, triglycerides, cholesterol/HDL ratio and fasting insulin as well as higher HDL-cholesterol concentrations (all P < 0.05). Similar results were observed in the external validation sample, although overall performance of the Brief Diet Quality Assessment Tool was slightly lower than in the development sample, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.79 and sensitivity, specificity and agreement values of 73.0, 69.0 and 71.3%, respectively.

conclusionThe CART approach yielded a simple and rapid Brief Diet Quality Assessment Tool that identifies individuals at risk of having a low-quality diet. Further studies are needed to test the performance of this tool in primary care settings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDietDiet SurveysFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritive ValueQuebecSurveys and QuestionnairesAlternative healthy eating indexBrief diet quality assessment toolClassification and regression treeDiet quality

Identifiers

PMID31387609
PMCPMC6685233
OpenAlexW2964447707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.