Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31387586›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution.

Ngoc T Nguyen, Hrayer Aprahamian, Ebru K Bish, Douglas R Bish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Considerations for Pooled Testing of Employees for SARS-CoV-2.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 through pool testing for COVID-19: an integrative review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sample pooling for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR screening.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ngoc T NguyenGrado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. ntn@vt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-7577
Hrayer AprahamianDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Ebru K BishGrado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Douglas R BishGrado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPooled testing, in which biological specimens from multiple subjects are combined into a testing pool and tested via a single test, is a common testing method for both surveillance and screening activities. The sensitivity of pooled testing for various pool sizes is an essential input for surveillance and screening optimization, including testing pool design. However, clinical data on test sensitivity values for different pool sizes are limited, and do not provide a functional relationship between test sensitivity and pool size. We develop a novel methodology to accurately compute the sensitivity of pooled testing, while accounting for viral load progression and pooling dilution. We demonstrate our methodology on the nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) technology for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

methodsOur methodology integrates mathematical models of viral load progression and pooling dilution to derive test sensitivity values for various pool sizes. This methodology derives the conditional test sensitivity, conditioned on the number of infected specimens in a pool, and uses the law of total probability, along with higher dimensional integrals, to derive pooled test sensitivity values. We also develop a highly accurate and easy-to-compute approximation function for pooled test sensitivity of the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay. We calibrate model parameters using published efficacy data for the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay, and clinical data on viral RNA load progression in HIV-infected patients, and use this methodology to derive and validate the sensitivity of the HIV ULTRIO Plus Assay for various pool sizes.

resultsWe demonstrate the value of this methodology through optimal testing pool design for HIV prevalence estimation in Sub-Saharan Africa. This case study indicates that the optimal testing pool design is highly efficient, and outperforms a benchmark pool design.

conclusionsThe proposed methodology accounts for both viral load progression and pooling dilution, and is computationally tractable. We calibrate this model for the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay, show that it provides highly accurate sensitivity estimates for various pool sizes, and, thus, yields efficient testing pool design for HIV prevalence estimation. Our model is generic, and can be calibrated for other infections.

Indexed as

Viral LoadBiomarkersCalibrationDisease ProgressionHIV InfectionsHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsBiomarkersRNA, ViralPooled testingPooling dilutionPublic health screeningSensitivity estimationSurveillance study

Identifiers

PMID31387586
PMCPMC6683472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.