ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2019
Distinct roles of cohesin acetyltransferases Esco1 and Esco2 in porcine oocyte meiosis I.
Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual roles of two Tfdps in germline nuclear meiosis and somatic nuclear fragmentation during sexual reproduction in the unicellular organismMarine life science & technology · 2026Article
- GWAS-Identified SNPs and Candidate Genes Influencing Sex in Loach (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Discordant effects of maternal age on the human MII oocyte transcriptome.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mammalian cells, cohesin acetyltransferases Esco1 and Esco2 acetylate cohesin subunit Smc3 to establish chromosome cohesion, ensuring the accurate chromosome segregation. However, we have previously documented that both Esco1 and Esco2 have unique substrates and roles in mouse oocyte meiosis I to orchestrate the meiotic progression, but whether these functions are conserved among species is still not determined. Here, we used porcine oocytes as a model to illustrate that Esco1 and Esco2 exerted conserved functions during oocyte meiosis. We observed that Esco1 and Esco2 exhibited different localization patterns in porcine oocytes. Esco1 was localized to the spindle apparatus while Esco2 was distributed on the chromosomes. Depletion of Esco1 by siRNA microinjection caused the meiotic arrest by showing the reduced frequency of first polar body extrusion and defective spindle/chromosome structure. In addition, Esco1 bound to α-tubulin and was required for its acetylation level to maintain the microtubule dynamics. By contrast, depletion of Esco2 by siRNA microinjection resulted in the accelerated meiotic progression by displaying the precocious polar body extrusion and inactivation of spindle assembly checkpoint. Notably, Esco2 was shown to be associated with histone H4 for the acetylation of H4K16 to modulate the kinetochore function. Collectively, our data reveal that Esco1 and Esco2 perform distinct and conserved functions in oocytes to drive the meiotic progression beyond their canonical roles in the cohesion establishment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.