Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31387509›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Azteca ants maintain unique microbiomes across functionally distinct nest chambers.

Jane M Lucas, Anne A Madden, Clint A Penick, Mary Jane Epps, Peter R Marting, Julia L Stevens, Daniel J Fergus, Robert R Dunn, Emily K Meineke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ant's Nest as a microenvironment: DistinctEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Insights Into the Ecological Role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane M LucasDepartment of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Anne A MaddenDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Clint A PenickThe Biomimicry Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Mary Jane EppsDepartment of Biology, Mary Baldwin University, Staunton, VA 24401, USA.
Peter R MartingSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Julia L StevensBayer Crop Science Division, Saint Louis, MO 63146, USA.
Daniel J FergusDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Robert R DunnDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Emily K MeinekeDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Arizona State University · USNorth Carolina State University · USBayer (United States) · USHarvard University · USMary Baldwin University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiome of built structures has considerable influence over an inhabitant's well-being, yet the vast majority of research has focused on human-built structures. Ants are well-known architects, capable of constructing elaborate dwellings, the microbiome of which is underexplored. Here, we explore the bacterial and fungal microbiomes in functionally distinct chambers within and outside the nests of Azteca alfari ants in Cecropia peltata trees. We predicted that A. alfari colonies (1) maintain distinct microbiomes within their nests compared to the surrounding environment, (2) maintain distinct microbiomes among nest chambers used for different functions, and (3) limit both ant and plant pathogens inside their nests. In support of these predictions, we found that internal and external nest sampling locations had distinct microbial communities, and A. alfari maintained lower bacterial richness in their 'nurseries'. While putative animal pathogens were suppressed in chambers that ants actively inhabited, putative plant pathogens were not, which does not support our hypothesis that A. alfari defends its host trees against microbial antagonists. Our results show that ants influence microbial communities inside their nests similar to studies of human homes. Unlike humans, ants limit the bacteria in their nurseries and potentially prevent the build-up of insect-infecting pathogens. These results highlight the importance of documenting how indoor microbiomes differ among species, which might improve our understanding of how to promote indoor health in human dwellings.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsAntsBacteriaCecropia PlantFungiReproductionAztecaCecropiamicrobemicrobiomemyrmecophyte

Identifiers

PMID31387509
PMCPMC6710589
OpenAlexW2965467224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.