Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31387210›Full record

ArticleCells2019

Bioink Composition and Printing Parameters for 3D Modeling Neural Tissue.

Valentina Fantini, Matteo Bordoni, Franca Scocozza, Michele Conti, Eveljn Scarian, Stephana Carelli, Anna Maria Di Giulio, Stefania Marconi, Orietta Pansarasa, Ferdinando Auricchio and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Evolution of Technology-Driven In Vitro Models for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Towards 3D Bioprinted Spinal Cord Organoids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent progresses in novelFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valentina FantiniDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Forlanini 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-4453
Matteo BordoniGenomic and post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Franca ScocozzaDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Michele ContiDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1275-0653
Eveljn ScarianGenomic and post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Stephana CarelliLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-396X
Anna Maria Di GiulioLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Stefania MarconiDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4608-6180
Orietta PansarasaGenomic and post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Ferdinando AuricchioDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Cristina CeredaGenomic and post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy. cristina.cereda@mondino.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are a broad class of pathologies characterized by the progressive loss of neurons in the central nervous system. The main problem in the study of NDs is the lack of an adequate realistic experimental model to study the pathogenic mechanisms. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) partially overcome the problem, with their capability to differentiate into almost every cell types; even so, these cells alone are not sufficient to unveil the mechanisms underlying NDs. 3D bioprinting allows to control the distribution of cells such as neurons, leading to the creation of a realistic in vitro model. In this work, we analyzed two biomaterials: sodium alginate and gelatin, and three different cell types: a neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y), iPSCs, and neural stem cells. All cells were encapsulated inside the bioink, printed and cultivated for at least seven days; they all presented good viability. We also evaluated the maintenance of the printed shape, opening the possibility to obtain a reliable in vitro neural tissue combining 3D bioprinting and iPSCs technology, optimizing the study of the degenerative processes that are still widely unknown.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAlginatesCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedGelatinHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsPrimary Cell CultureAlginatesGelatin3D bioprinting3D cell culturebioinkcell culturedisease modelinggelatiniPSCneural stem cellneuroblastoma cell linesodium alginate

Identifiers

PMID31387210
PMCPMC6721723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.