Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31387199›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Comparative Analysis of the Liver and Spleen Transcriptomes between Holstein and Yunnan Humped Cattle.

Yanyan Chen, Benjuan Zeng, Peng Shi, Heng Xiao, Shanyuan Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanyan ChenKunming Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650203, China.
Benjuan ZengSchool of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Peng ShiKunming Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650203, China. ship@mail.kiz.ac.cn.
Heng XiaoSchool of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China. xiaoheng@ynu.edu.cn.
Shanyuan ChenSchool of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China. chensy@ynu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-9428
Yunnan University · CNKunming Institute of Zoology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31460281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that Yunnan humped cattle have higher disease resistance than pure taurine cattle, such as Holsteins. However, there exists limited information about the molecular genetic basis underlying disease resistance differences between them. The objective of this study was to compare differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the liver and spleen tissues of Holstein and Yunnan humped cattle through comparative transcriptome analysis, using RNA-sequencing. In total, 1564 (647 up- and 917 down-regulated genes) and 1530 (716 up- and 814 down-regulated genes) DEGs were obtained in the liver and spleen tissues of Holstein and Yunnan humped cattle comparison groups, respectively. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly associated with the RIG-I signaling pathway, immune responses, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I protein complex and complement activation, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type-I (HTLV-I) infection. Some genes related to immune function, such as

Indexed as

differentially expressed genesdisease resistanceHolstein cattleRNA-seqYunnan humped cattle

Identifiers

PMID31387199
PMCPMC6720278
OpenAlexW2965181777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.