Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386959›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2019

Suspect screening and prioritization of chemicals of concern (COCs) in a forest-water reuse system watershed.

Melanie L Hedgespeth, Nancy Gibson, James McCord, Mark Strynar, Damian Shea, Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie L HedgespethDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: mlhedges@ncsu.edu.
Nancy GibsonDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: negibson@ncsu.edu.
James McCordUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: mccord.james@epa.gov.
Mark StrynarUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: strynar.mark@epa.gov.
Damian SheaDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: d_shea@ncsu.edu.
Elizabeth Guthrie NicholsDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: egnichol@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much research has assessed organic chemicals of concern (COCs) in municipal wastewater and receiving waters, but few studies have examined COCs in land treatment systems. Many prior studies have implemented targeted methods that quantify a relatively small fraction of COCs present in wastewater and receiving waters. This study used suspect screening to assess chemical features in ground- and surface waters from a watershed where secondary-treated wastewater is irrigated onto 900 ha of temperate forest, offering a more holistic view of chemicals that contribute to the exposome. Chemical features were prioritized by abundance and ToxPi scoring across seasonal sampling events to determine if the forest-water reuse system contributed to the chemical exposome of ground- and surface waters. The number of chemical features detected in wastewater was usually higher than on- and off-site ground- and surface waters; in wastewater, chemical features trended with precipitation in which greater numbers of features were detected in months with low precipitation. The number of chemical features detected in off- and on-site waters was similar. The lower overlap between chemical features found in wastewater and downstream surface waters, along with the similar numbers of features being detected in upstream and downstream surface waters, suggests that though wastewater may be a source of chemicals to ground and surface waters on-site, dissipation of wastewater-derived features (in number and peak area abundance) likely occurs with limited off-site surface water export by the forested land treatment system. Further, the numbers of features detected on site and the overlap between wastewater and surface waters did not increase during periods of low rainfall, counter to our initial expectations. The chemical features tentatively identified in this watershed appear common to features identified in other studies, warranting further examination on the potential for resulting impacts of these on humans and the environment.

Indexed as

ExposomeForestHRMSSuspect screeningWastewater

Identifiers

PMID31386959
PMCPMC8425958
OpenAlexW2958738245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.