Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Unravelling intra- and intersegmental neuronal connectivity between central pattern generating networks in a multi-legged locomotor system.

Silvia Daun, Charalampos Mantziaris, Tibor Tóth, Ansgar Büschges, Nils Rosjat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Existence of a Long-Range Caudo-Rostral Sensory Influence in Terrestrial Locomotion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia DaunHeisenberg Research Group of Computational Neuroscience - Modelling Neural Network Function, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7342-1015
Charalampos MantziarisDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tibor TóthHeisenberg Research Group of Computational Neuroscience - Modelling Neural Network Function, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ansgar BüschgesDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nils RosjatHeisenberg Research Group of Computational Neuroscience - Modelling Neural Network Function, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal walking results from a complex interplay of central pattern generating networks (CPGs), local sensory signals expressing position, velocity and forces generated in the legs, and coordinating signals between neighboring legs. In particular, the CPGs control the activity of motoneuron (MN) pools which drive the muscles of the individual legs and are thereby responsible for the generation of rhythmic leg movements. The rhythmic activity of the CPGs as well as their connectivity can be modified by the aforementioned sensory signals. However, the precise nature of the interaction between the CPGs and these sensory signals has remained generally largely unknown. Experimental methods aiming at finding out details of these interactions often apply cholinergic agonists such as pilocarpine in order to induce rhythmic activity in the CPGs. Using this general approach, we removed the influence of sensory signals and investigated the putative connections between CPGs controlling the upward/downward movement in the different legs of the stick insect. The experimental data, i.e. the measured MN activities, underwent connectivity analysis using Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM). This method can uncover the underlying coupling structure and strength between pairs of segmental CPGs. For the analysis we set up different coupling schemes (models) for DCM and compared them using Bayesian Model Selection (BMS). Models with contralateral connections in each segment and ipsilateral connections on both sides, as well as the coupling from the meta- to the ipsilateral prothoracic ganglion were preferred by BMS to all other types of models tested. Moreover, the intrasegmental coupling strength in the mesothoracic ganglion was the strongest and most stable in all three ganglia.

Indexed as

AnimalsBayes TheoremCholinergic AgonistsExtremitiesGanglia, InvertebrateInsectaModels, BiologicalMotor NeuronsNerve NetWalkingCholinergic Agonists

Identifiers

PMID31386699
PMCPMC6684069
OpenAlexW2964925904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.