Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386686›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Networks of face-to-face social contacts in Niakhar, Senegal.

Gail E Potter, Jimmy Wong, Jonathan Sugimoto, Aldiouma Diallo, John C Victor, Kathleen Neuzil, M Elizabeth Halloran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gail E PotterThe Emmes Company, Rockville, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6667-6992
Jimmy WongCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States of America.
Jonathan SugimotoFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Aldiouma DialloInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, Niakhar, Senegal.
John C VictorPATH, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Kathleen NeuzilUniversity of Maryland Center for Vaccine Development, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
M Elizabeth HalloranFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Funding

Understanding Transmission with Integrated Genetic and Epidemiologic InferenceU54GM111274 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI VESPIGNANI, ALESSANDRO · 2014 to 2018
$12.5M
Containing Bioterrorist and Emerging Infectious DiseasesU01GM070749 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HALLORAN, M ELIZABETH, LONGINI, IRA M · 2004 to 2013
$8.3M
Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in a Tropical Developing African CountryU01IP000174 · IP · PATH · PI VICTOR, JOHN CHRISTIAN · 2008 to 2010
$4.0M
NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000174NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM070749NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM111274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the first analysis of face-to-face contact network data from Niakhar, Senegal. Participants in a cluster-randomized influenza vaccine trial were interviewed about their contact patterns when they reported symptoms during their weekly household surveillance visit. We employ a negative binomial model to estimate effects of covariates on contact degree. We estimate the mean contact degree for asymptomatic Niakhar residents to be 16.5 (95% C.I. 14.3, 18.7) in the morning and 14.8 in the afternoon (95% C.I. 12.7, 16.9). We estimate that symptomatic people make 10% fewer contacts than asymptomatic people (95% C.I. 5%, 16%; p = 0.006), and those aged 0-5 make 33% fewer contacts than adults (95% C.I. 29%, 37%; p < 0.001). By explicitly modelling the partial rounding pattern observed in our data, we make inference for both the underlying (true) distribution of contacts as well as for the reported distribution. We created an estimator for homophily by compound (household) membership and estimate that 48% of contacts by symptomatic people are made to their own compound members in the morning (95% CI, 45%, 52%) and 60% in the afternoon/evening (95% CI, 56%, 64%). We did not find a significant effect of symptom status on compound homophily. We compare our findings to those from other countries and make design recommendations for future surveys.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSocial BehaviorFamily CharacteristicsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPsychological DistancePublic Health SurveillanceSenegalSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31386686
PMCPMC6684077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.