Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386685›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Home rehabilitation supported by a wearable soft-robotic device for improving hand function in older adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Bob Radder, Gerdienke B Prange-Lasonder, Anke I R Kottink, Johnny Holmberg, Kristin Sletta, Manon van Dijk, Thomas Meyer, Alejandro Melendez-Calderon, Jaap H Buurke, Johan S Rietman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07327151 (Soft Rehabilitation Gloves as Assistive Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07327151 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Soft Rehabilitation Gloves as Assistive Technology: Enhancing Upper Limb Motor Function and Activities of Daily Living in Chronic Stroke-A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKocaeli UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsStrokeArmsSybero SRGs, Occupational therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bob RadderRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-6180
Gerdienke B Prange-LasonderRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Anke I R KottinkRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Johnny HolmbergEskilstuna Kommun Vård- och omsorgsförvaltningen, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Kristin SlettaEskilstuna Kommun Vård- och omsorgsförvaltningen, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Manon van DijkNational Foundation for the Elderly, Bunnik, the Netherlands.
Thomas MeyerterzStiftung, Berlingen, Switzerland.
Alejandro Melendez-CalderonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Jaap H BuurkeRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Johan S RietmanRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew developments, based on the concept of wearable soft-robotic devices, make it possible to support impaired hand function during the performance of daily activities and intensive task-specific training. The wearable soft-robotic ironHand glove is such a system that supports grip strength during the performance of daily activities and hand training exercises at home.

designThis pilot randomized controlled clinical study explored the effect of prolonged use of the assistive ironHand glove during daily activities at home, in comparison to its use as a trainings tool at home, on functional performance of the hand.

methodsIn total, 91 older adults with self-perceived decline of hand function participated in this study. They were randomly assigned to a 4-weeks intervention of either assistive or therapeutic ironHand use, or control group (received no additional exercise or treatment). All participants performed a maximal pinch grip test, Box and Blocks test (BBT), Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) at baseline and after 4-weeks of intervention. Only participants of the assistive and therapeutic group completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) after the intervention period.

resultsParticipants of the assistive and therapeutic group reported high scores on the SUS (mean = 73, SEM = 2). The therapeutic group showed improvements in unsupported handgrip strength (mean Δ = 3) and pinch strength (mean Δ = 0.5) after 4 weeks of ironHand use (p≤0.039). Scores on the BBT and JTHFT improved not only after 4 weeks of ironHand use (assistive and therapeutic), but also in the control group. Only handgrip strength improved more in the therapeutic group compared to the assistive and control group. No significant correlations were found between changes in performance and assistive or therapeutic ironHand use (p≥0.062).

conclusionThis study showed that support of the wearable soft-robotic ironHand system either as assistive device or as training tool may be a promising way to counter functional hand function decline associated with ageing.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRehabilitationRoboticsSelf-Help DevicesWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID31386685
PMCPMC6684161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.