Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386657›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Remote reefs and seamounts are the last refuges for marine predators across the Indo-Pacific.

Tom B Letessier, David Mouillot, Phil J Bouchet, Laurent Vigliola, Marjorie C Fernandes, Chris Thompson, Germain Boussarie, Jemma Turner, Jean-Baptiste Juhel, Eva Maire and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of protection on large-bodied reef fishes in the western Indian Ocean.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Three-dimensional conservation planning of fish biodiversity metrics to achieve the deep-sea 30×30 conservation target.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of human footprint and biophysical factors on the body-size structure of fished marine species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Leveraging social media and deep learning to detect rare megafauna in video surveys.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tom B LetessierInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-0207
David MouillotMARBEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-2605
Phil J BouchetSchool of Biological Sciences and The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, (M092), Crawley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2144-2049
Laurent VigliolaInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR ENTROPIE, LABEX Corail, Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Marjorie C FernandesSchool of Biological Sciences and The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, (M092), Crawley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7989-7839
Chris ThompsonSchool of Biological Sciences and The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, (M092), Crawley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-0221
Germain BoussarieSchool of Biological Sciences and The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, (M092), Crawley, Australia.
Jemma TurnerSchool of Biological Sciences and The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, (M092), Crawley, Australia.
Jean-Baptiste JuhelMARBEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2627-394X
Eva MaireMARBEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1032-3394
M Julian CaleySchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Heather J KoldeweyCentre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Alan FriedlanderPristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Enric SalaPristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-3570
Jessica J MeeuwigSchool of Biological Sciences and The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, (M092), Crawley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1169-8785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1950s, industrial fisheries have expanded globally, as fishing vessels are required to travel further afield for fishing opportunities. Technological advancements and fishery subsidies have granted ever-increasing access to populations of sharks, tunas, billfishes, and other predators. Wilderness refuges, defined here as areas beyond the detectable range of human influence, are therefore increasingly rare. In order to achieve marine resources sustainability, large no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) with pelagic components are being implemented. However, such conservation efforts require knowledge of the critical habitats for predators, both across shallow reefs and the deeper ocean. Here, we fill this gap in knowledge across the Indo-Pacific by using 1,041 midwater baited videos to survey sharks and other pelagic predators such as rainbow runner (Elagatis bipinnulata), mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus), and black marlin (Istiompax indica). We modeled three key predator community attributes: vertebrate species richness, mean maximum body size, and shark abundance as a function of geomorphology, environmental conditions, and human pressures. All attributes were primarily driven by geomorphology (35%-62% variance explained) and environmental conditions (14%-49%). While human pressures had no influence on species richness, both body size and shark abundance responded strongly to distance to human markets (12%-20%). Refuges were identified at more than 1,250 km from human markets for body size and for shark abundance. These refuges were identified as remote and shallow seabed features, such as seamounts, submerged banks, and reefs. Worryingly, hotpots of large individuals and of shark abundance are presently under-represented within no-take MPAs that aim to effectively protect marine predators, such as the British Indian Ocean Territory. Population recovery of predators is unlikely to occur without strategic placement and effective enforcement of large no-take MPAs in both coastal and remote locations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquatic OrganismsBody SizeConservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsEcosystemFood SupplyPacific OceanPredatory BehaviorSeafoodWilderness

Identifiers

PMID31386657
PMCPMC6684043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.