Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386097›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2016

Repurposing existing agents as adjunct therapies for glioblastoma.

Benjamin Purow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of ongoing clinical trials in optic pathway gliomas.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Fulfilling the purpose and scope ofNeuro-oncology practice · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin PurowNeurology Department, University of Virginia Neuro-Oncology Division, Old Medical School Room 4881, 21 Hospital Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA (B.P.).
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous non-oncologic medications have been found in the last decade to have anti-cancer properties. While the focus in oncology research should clearly remain on deriving new therapeutic strategies, repurposing these existing medications may offer the potential to rapidly enhance the effectiveness of treatment for resistant cancers. Glioblastoma, the most common and lethal brain cancer, is highly resistant to standard therapies and would benefit from even minor improvements in treatment. Numerous agents already in the clinic for non-cancer applications have been found to also possess potential against cancer or specifically against glioblastoma. These include agents with activities affecting oxidative stress, the immune reponse, epigenetic modifiers, cancer cell metabolism, and angiogenesis and invasiveness. This review serves as a guide for potential ways to repurpose individual drugs alongside standard glioblastoma therapies.

Indexed as

epigeneticglioblastomaimmunologicmetabolicrepurposing

Identifiers

PMID31386097
PMCPMC6668279
OpenAlexW2432608352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.