ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2015
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The High Cost of Misdiagnosis: The Challenges of Differentiating Grade-4 Astrocytoma from Glioblastoma in Resource-Constrained Countries.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Daily locomotor activity declines with tumor growth and disease progression in glioblastoma.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Article
- Imaging of supratentorial intraventricular masses in children: a pictorial review-part 2.Neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Review
- Novel Therapies in Glioblastoma Treatment: Review of Glioblastoma; Current Treatment Options; and Novel Oncolytic Viral Therapies.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Recent advances in the detection of glioblastoma, from imaging-based methods to proteomics and biosensors: A narrative review.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- Glioblastoma multiforme: a multi-omics analysis of driver genes and tumour heterogeneity.Interface focus · 2021Article
- [Epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and evolutionary features of patients with glioblastoma: series of cases managed in the Department of Hematology-Oncology at the Mohammed VI University Hospital Center in Marrakech in 2016 and 2017].The Pan African medical journal · 2021Review
- A Review of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Glioblastoma: Overview of Disease and Treatment.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (WHO grade IV astrocytoma) is the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Optimal treatment of a patient with glioblastoma requires collaborative care across numerous specialties. The diagnosis of glioblastoma may be suggested by the symptomatic presentation and imaging, but it must be pathologically confirmed via surgery, which can have dual diagnostic and therapeutic roles. Standard of care postsurgical treatment for newly diagnosed patients involves radiation therapy and oral temozolomide chemotherapy. Despite numerous recent trials of novel therapeutic approaches, this standard of care has not changed in over a decade. Treatment options under active investigation include molecularly targeted therapies, immunotherapeutic approaches, and the use of alternating electrical field to disrupt tumor cell division. These trials may be aided by new insights into glioblastoma heterogeneity, allowing for focused evaluation of new treatments in the patient subpopulations most likely to benefit from them. Because glioblastoma is incurable by current therapies, frequent clinical and radiographic assessment is needed after initial treatment to allow for early intervention upon progressive tumor when it occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.