Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386046›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2019

Acute neurologic toxicity of palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade.

W Tristram Arscott, Simeng Zhu, John P Plastaras, Amit Maity, Michelle Alonso-Basanta, Joshua Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W Tristram ArscottDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-0110-8569
Simeng ZhuCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
John P PlastarasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.
Amit MaityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.
Michelle Alonso-BasantaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.
Joshua JonesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interaction between immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and radiation (RT) for brain metastases has not been well understood. Given that acute neurotoxicity from this combination is not well characterized, we reviewed patients receiving ICB and RT for brain metastases.

methodsPatients treated with ICB and cranial RT from 2010 through 2017 were reviewed. ICB and RT must have been administered within 30 days of each other. Treatment parameters, performance status, symptoms prior to treatment, and toxicity were extracted from the electronic medical record. Survival was calculated from the end of RT to last follow-up or death.

resultsSeventy-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 177 days (range, 12-1603). Median age was 64 years old (range, 29-98) and 47 (63%) were male. The main tumor types were melanoma (n = 47) and nonsmall-cell lung cancer (n = 19). Fifty-seven patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 21 with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Most patients received single-agent ICB, though 4 patients received nivolumab and ipilimumab. Forty-one (53%) patients reported no neurologic toxicity. Grade 2 or greater neurologic toxicities were reported in 12 (21%) and 8 (38%) patients in the SRS and WBRT groups, respectively. WBRT was associated with a greater risk of any neurotoxicity, though there was no correlation between ICB agent and toxicity. Sequencing of ICB and RT (ie, <30 days vs <7) did not influence rates of toxicity.

conclusionsICB during SRS or WBRT does not appear to worsen acute neurotoxicity compared to historical controls of RT alone.

Indexed as

acute toxicityimmunotherapystereotactic radiosurgerywhole-brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31386046
PMCPMC6660815
OpenAlexW2898110556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.