Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386039›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2019

Nebojša Skorupan, Surabhi Ranjan, Seema Mehta, Olga Yankulina, Nathan Nenortas, Stuart Grossman, Xiaobu Ye, Matthias Holdhoff

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nebojša SkorupanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Surabhi RanjanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Seema MehtaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Olga YankulinaThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nathan NenortasThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stuart GrossmanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Xiaobu YeThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthias HoldhoffThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsAn online survey of 14 multiple choice questions was sent to 207 neuro-oncologists and medical oncologists treating brain cancers at all National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in the United States. Recipients were identified via a search of the cancer centers' websites.

resultsSixty-one invited experts completed the survey (response rate 29%; of these, 72% were neuro-oncologists, 18% were medical oncologists, and 10% were pediatric neuro- or medical oncologists). Seventy percent of respondents stated that they routinely prescribe PJP prophylaxis, while 7% do not provide prophylaxis. Eighty-one percent of respondents use absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) to assess lymphopenia and 13% also monitor CD4 lymphocyte counts during prophylaxis. The most commonly used first-line agent is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88% of respondents), followed by pentamidine (6%). Discontinuation of PJP prophylaxis is determined by the following: count recovery (33% by ALC; 18% by CD4 lymphocyte counts), radiation completion (23%), and chemotherapy completion (7%). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase levels were routinely checked by only 13% of respondents.

conclusionsPJP prophylaxis is commonly used in HGG patients, but there are large variations in practice patterns, including the duration of prophylaxis. As consideration for PJP prophylaxis affects all patients with HGG, standardization of prophylaxis should be formally addressed.

Indexed as

glioblastomaglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenasehigh-grade gliomalymphopeniaPneumocystis carinii pneumoniaPneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID31386039
PMCPMC6660813
OpenAlexW2904516088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.