ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2018
Central nervous system involvement in children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma. A report from the AIEOP Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic role of bone erosion in orbital RMS: a report from the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG).Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical features and prognosis of paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma with bone marrow metastasis: a single Centre experiences in China.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma metastatic to the brain.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a highly malignant tumor typically affecting children and adolescents. Central nervous system (CNS) dissemination is rare in RMS patients, but seems to have a particularly negative impact. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment and outcome of patients with RMS and evidence of CNS disease who were registered in the protocols coordinated by the Italian Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee from March 1979 to December 2016.
methodsWe analyzed 39 patients with CNS disease. Depending on when their CNS disease was identified, we grouped patients as: Group A, at diagnosis; Group B, progression during treatment; Group C, at first relapse.
resultsSix patients were in Group A (2.7% of metastatic RMS patients at diagnosis); 24 were in Group B and 9 in Group C (6.5% of patients with tumor progression/relapse included in the protocols). Only 5 patients (4 in Group A, 1 in Group B) survived the event and are alive in complete remission with a median follow-up of 17.5 years. These 5 patients received systemic chemotherapy and craniospinal radiotherapy, and 2 of them also received intrathecal therapy with topotecan.
conclusionsCNS involvement at diagnosis is a rare and prognostically negative event in RMS patients, but not always fatal when it is found at diagnosis. It is more frequent during or shortly after treatment, and the more dismal prognosis in these cases underscores the need to improve our ability to identify patients at risk of CNS dissemination in order to attempt more effective treatments that can sterilize the meninges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.